Jump to content

ESPN finally getting its shit together- no more politics

Goo Punch

By Goo Punch
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Chico_SA

Chico_SA 521

Posted
Posted (edited)

If a sports person is frowning or acting like what they are talking about is really important( I’m looking at you Howie Long) I’m done with that show. I’m changing the channel, whatever channel it may be. ESPNs yelling and arguing shows were a huge turn off

Edited by Chico_SA
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Monster

Monster 219

Posted
Posted

Watching the Cubs on ESPN about a week ago.

"There's a single by Contreras...Contreras is  from Venezuela...here's an info graphic about the evil deeds of the current Venezuelan regime.  Subtext-These poor Venezuelans should let us install our guy as leader and he will help them liberate their oil.   I mean, people.  I meant to say people, not oil."    

I'm trying to watch fucking baseball and relax, but ESPN can't resist posting an info graphic about an oil-rich South American country that won't bend to our will.     

I hope I'm wrong, but the people that now run Disney aren't going to stop using ESPN to spread their messages.    They'll subsidize the entire network if it gets them in front of a demographic that they can't reach through their other networks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catdaddyhorn

Catdaddyhorn 3444

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, alincoln said:

ESPN's decline is attributable to many causes.  Injecting identity politics into Sportscenter certainly didn't help its cause given the target demographic, but eliminating politics discussion isn't going to address cord cutting and the associated pressure on ESPN's carriage fees or bring back the sophisticated fans who left years ago after ESPN "dumbed down" their content.

ESPN is sports media intended for the ignorant masses of American society who watch television between 9 - 5 on weekdays.  UT alumni are not the target demo for its non-live sports programming.   

When exactly was ESPN ever considered "high minded" in the past? Outside of the NFL matchup show (which comes on at like 5AM Sunday mornings) and a few other segments on Sports Center, ESPN has never embraced anything resembling sub surface programming. I agree with @Huckleberry, If ESPN feels they need the punditry shows they would do well to mix things up and offer some shows that have an analytical perspective as well. I think there are plenty of people who would be interested in stuff like that. And especially in this day and age when there's so much analytical data available and when niche programming can be more successful that one would think, it's a wonder why ESPN hasn't done much in this area. Somewhat ironically Max Kellerman used to be great at this when he hosted an ESPN radio show with Brian Kenny way back in the day about 10 to 15 years ago. They were really into sabremetrics and all sorts of analytical data with different sports. Now Kellerman has gone to the opposite end of the spectrum with dumbed down, manufactured, you take that side, I take the other "debate".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
notre dame joe

notre dame joe 173

Posted
Posted
On ‎5‎/‎22‎/‎2019 at 7:39 PM, Valmy77 said:

I want ESPN to cover sports and do in depth nerd analysis like they did back in the 1990s, all while not taking themselves too seriously. Then they started thinking they were hot shit and they were the story instead of the sports being the story.

And they can say whatever they want about Donald Trump or whomever on Twitter I just don't want that shit in my sports coverage.

I mean I barely care what political pundits have to say about to say about politics, much less sports ones.

On ‎5‎/‎22‎/‎2019 at 9:26 PM, fellside said:

To all the nostalgic people who blame ESPN for losing their soul, do you really believe the 90s model works in an era where people can check scores and get highlights immediately?

I would watch SC highlights not knowing who won the game back then. I had to watch in the morning before school to find out if my team won the night before. Hell, I would wait around for ESPNEWS to get to my teams' highlights and get pissed if they didn't get enough attention. They had a monopoly.

This isn't complicated. The only product they offer in high demand and low supply are their live rights.  A Twitter account, a few podcast subscriptions, and YouTube videos cover the rest.

With however many channels + streaming they could quarantine the strategy talk in one place and Athlete 90210 in another.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85141

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Uncle Boobs said:

Why waste hours a day listening to shitty hot takes on shitty debate shows on ESPN when instead I can just spend hours a day on Surlyhorns reading even shittier hot takes?

Yeah, at least our shittier hot takes come with gifs, memes, boobs and Derka. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyHoffa

JimmyHoffa 1188

Posted
Posted
On 5/22/2019 at 11:26 PM, fellside said:

To all the nostalgic people who blame ESPN for losing their soul, do you really believe the 90s model works in an era where people can check scores and get highlights immediately?

I would watch SC highlights not knowing who won the game back then. I had to watch in the morning before school to find out if my team won the night before. Hell, I would wait around for ESPNEWS to get to my teams' highlights and get pissed if they didn't get enough attention. They had a monopoly.

This isn't complicated. The only product they offer in high demand and low supply are their live rights.  A Twitter account, a few podcast subscriptions, and YouTube videos cover the rest.

100% this.

When I was in college we used to watch headline news at: 08,18,28,38,48, and 58 because that was the only way you could find out what the scores were on games going on out of our area that we had bet on. 

I agree the 90's ESPN model is dead and would never work but that really isn't their problem. Their problem is aside from their live coverage and a few pregame shows their other programming has been AWFUL the last 20 years. They did have a monopoly and they fucked it up by putting out shitty programming back when they had all the viewers in the world to take advantage of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fellside

fellside 1079

Posted
Posted

As of last year, 33 million people have cancelled cable and not re-subscribed.  6 in 10 people aged 18-29 only watch streaming services. 

https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/cord-cutting-2018-estimates-33-million-us-study-1202881488/

It gets worse.  People younger than that hardly watch any live TV viewing at all.  Not even with Hulu Live or YouTubeTV.  They almost exclusively watch YouTubers or Netflix original content or old shows on Netflix.

Attributing ESPN's decline to politics is like attributing the cause of the Great Depression to Babe Ruth's dieting habits.  And no matter how may times this gets pointed out, people are going to respond with, "Yeah but ESPN let all that happen by ruining how great it used to be!"

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyHoffa

JimmyHoffa 1188

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, fellside said:

As of last year, 33 million people have cancelled cable and not re-subscribed.  6 in 10 people aged 18-29 only watch streaming services. 

https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/cord-cutting-2018-estimates-33-million-us-study-1202881488/

It gets worse.  People younger than that hardly watch any live TV viewing at all.  Not even with Hulu Live or YouTubeTV.  They almost exclusively watch YouTubers or Netflix original content or old shows on Netflix.

Attributing ESPN's decline to politics is like attributing the cause of the Great Depression to Babe Ruth's dieting habits.  And no matter how may times this gets pointed out, people are going to respond with, "Yeah but ESPN let all that happen by ruining how great it used to be!"


And 20 million people watched a paid subscription channel last Sunday night. It's about content. Regardless of source if you make good whatever, people will consume it. That's where ESPN fucked themselves. Their content outside of live games has been shit for years. They like cable companies assumed incorrectly that people would always pay to have access to their channels for the live sporting events alone.

Politics wasn't their downfall and neither was cable cutters, it was shitty content outside of access to their live game rights.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
irishtexan

irishtexan 11445

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, fellside said:

As of last year, 33 million people have cancelled cable and not re-subscribed.  6 in 10 people aged 18-29 only watch streaming services. 

https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/cord-cutting-2018-estimates-33-million-us-study-1202881488/

It gets worse.  People younger than that hardly watch any live TV viewing at all.  Not even with Hulu Live or YouTubeTV.  They almost exclusively watch YouTubers or Netflix original content or old shows on Netflix.

Attributing ESPN's decline to politics is like attributing the cause of the Great Depression to Babe Ruth's dieting habits.  And no matter how may times this gets pointed out, people are going to respond with, "Yeah but ESPN let all that happen by ruining how great it used to be!"

We quit cable about 6-7 years ago. Streaming only. We share subscriptions. We pay for Netflix, parents pay for HBO, friend gives me his basic cable password, brother pays for Hulu. Everyone shares. 

Sometimes when we watch a show on the FX app, for instance, there will be limited commercials. My kids are fucking flummoxed. They get so angry whenever there's a commercial saying "why can't you fast forward through this commercial?! I don't like commercials!" They're have no idea how spoiled they are. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89465

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, bmbmd said:

They lost me when the discontinued their Saturday morning outdoor block, especially Jerry McKinnis' "The Fishin' Hole" and "Walkers Cay Chronicles".  

Thankfully you can find a ton of that old stuff, including a lot of Bill Dance, on YouTube.  Plus there’s a shit-ton of new fishing shows on YouTube that are pretty solid, covering every little niche there is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bmbmd

bmbmd 1027

Posted
Posted
Just now, atomheartbevo said:

Thankfully you can find a ton of that old stuff, including a lot of Bill Dance, on YouTube.  Plus there’s a shit-ton of new fishing shows on YouTube that are pretty solid, covering every little niche there is.  

Jerry fishing with Bobby Knight in the Boundary waters may be the best outdoors episode ever.  Who knew Bob Knight had a sense of humor?  Most of the Walker's Cay episodes are available on the Hells Bay Boats web site.  Sucks for me because I run a Beavertail.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyHoffa

JimmyHoffa 1188

Posted
Posted

The whole ESPN+ thing is interesting. They continue to put more game content on their to get people to pay $4.99 a month for it yet they are losing money with only 2 Million subscribers. 

The company said that its direct-to-consumer and international segment lost $136 million in the quarter on revenue of $918 million.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/05/disney-says-espn-has-2-million-paid-subscribers-but-is-losing-money.html

 

It will be interesting to see how things play out. As a sports fan (obviously) I would have probably watched the EPL playoff over the weekend between Derby County and Aston Villa but didn't because it was on ESPN+. I know most on here are sports fans but there are a shit ton of people that never watch ESPN and plenty of sports fans that won't pay for secondary league or sports games.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sandman

Sandman 3403

Posted
Posted
On 5/24/2019 at 7:54 AM, bmbmd said:

They lost me when the discontinued their Saturday morning outdoor block, especially Jerry McKinnis' "The Fishin' Hole" and "Walkers Cay Chronicles".  

Walkers Cay was the shit. Guy fishing and talking about life and nature and whatever. Loved it.

I miss the lumberjack stuff as well. I always expected to see a guy chop off his foot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ignatius

Ignatius 4002

Posted
Posted

Dinosaur here, but it sounds like 75% of ‘cord cutting’ still relies on somebody somewhere to have a cable/satellite subscription, at least for live sports.

Are there really that many people out there sponging off of their parents for their Spectrum login?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tex Long

Tex Long 4351

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Ignatius said:

Dinosaur here, but it sounds like 75% of ‘cord cutting’ still relies on somebody somewhere to have a cable/satellite subscription, at least for live sports.

Are there really that many people out there sponging off of their parents for their Spectrum login?

There seems to be a plethora of people streaming sports, particularly ones that don't play dozens or undreds of games a year. The reddit dot com slash r slash XXXstreams forums usually have lots of links to streamers, particularly when XXX is CFB or NFL, but others as well. 

I've run into several folks who share rather than sponging - one couple has a Netflix account, which they share with their two kids. One of the kids has a Vue account, the other has a Prime and a Hulu - all shared. Is "the cord" cut? Maybe not, but it's damn sure stretched out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pam Cummings

Pam Cummings 9589

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, DougO said:

ESPN is to sports as MTV is to music. 

As in, everyone reminisces about it being greater than it really was when actually we just had nowhere else to get sports highlights/music videos. 

They should have never gotten rid of the niche shows. Maybe they got self conscious when Dodgeball came out and mocked them with the whole "ESPN 8: The Ocho" bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Armybrat

Armybrat 40751

Posted
Posted (edited)

I’m still paying $200+  monthly for Spectrum (3 cable boxes around the house) we only DVR programming from maybe a dozen channels. Am not sure how this streaming stuff works. 

We do have a 4g wireless router for the tablets and new Samsung smartass 4K TV. I did finally figure out (with Surly help) how to get the Internet on said TV. Did see all those icons for the subscription services, but don’t have a clue how those work or how to pay for them.

Edited by Armybrat
Link to comment
Share on other sites
closetojumping

closetojumping 62259

Posted
Posted
On 5/23/2019 at 6:55 PM, Foosters said:

Which shows are you talking about? The old sportscenter and baseball tonight models? Majority highlights with commentary on top?

If so, there's not much left. Quick Pitch on MLB TV is somewhat like that.

For me, instead of watching sportscenter on Sunday night to see what happened in the NFL, I go to Reddit/r/NFL where every play that's worth seeing is posted within minutes of it happening. Same for college football.

 

MLB TV is the best sports channel available and I can’t even think of a close second. They cover the game from all angles and play nothing but highlights, games, commentary and analysis on the season, and baseball films. 

Anyone saying politics didn’t play a role in ESPN gargling balls is pushing their own bullshit agenda. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beau Vine

Beau Vine 54011

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Armybrat said:

I’m still paying $200+  monthly for Spectrum (3 cable boxes around the house) we only DVR programming from maybe a dozen channels. Am not sure how this streaming stuff works. 

We do have a 4g wireless router for the tablets and new Samsung smartass 4K TV. I did finally figure out (with Surly help) how to get the Internet on said TV. Did see all those icons for the subscription services, but don’t have a clue how those work or how to pay for them.

tv.youtube.com

You can do a 1-week free trial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChiTownDoc

ChiTownDoc 21102

Posted
Posted
On 5/23/2019 at 9:18 AM, Junior Miller said:

Political commentary didn't do shit to ESPN. ESPN's problem isn't anything ESPN has done really. Their problem is the internet. They were the typewriter and got hit with the PC revolution. They used to be the only place for sports coverage. Now there's 10 billion places and every sports entity on the planet has anywhere from 100 to 1,000,000 websites dedicated to it. 

Are you sure it’s not the damn Yankees and their views?!?!  Lol

And seriously when I was a kid in the late 80’s / early 90’s, I craved sports, any sports.  It was hard getting your fix.  It’s a completely different world and they’ve adapted poorly... but it’s not like they’re struggling that much worse than other traditional TV outlets.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SwanderedTalent

SwanderedTalent 5761

Posted
Posted

Television viewers are creatures of habit. They'd have kept ponying up for cable and watching ESPN if they liked the content. They didn't, and part of the reason is, the vast majority of sports viewers don't want political content or commentary mixed in with their diversionary entertainment even in small doses.

If you don't understand that last, you have surrounded yourself with the kind of weirdos that think Designated Survivor got good when it moved to a drama about domestic policy compromise.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Capn81

Capn81 372

Posted
Posted

I think it goes deeper than politics as well. I stopped watching the shows because it was over-the-top. Everything had to have a message. Everyone had to scream. I can check my phone for scores and get highlights off of their app with less desire to vomit.

I turned on Golic and Wingo this morning on my drive to work. I actually liked the first segment that they did, but then they played a clip of Stephen A screaming about Magic Johnson that went on for at least 60 seconds. I had to flip back to MLB Radio Network.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyHoffa

JimmyHoffa 1188

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Capn81 said:

I think it goes deeper than politics as well. I stopped watching the shows because it was over-the-top. Everything had to have a message. Everyone had to scream. I can check my phone for scores and get highlights off of their app with less desire to vomit.

 

 

Yep, they became cable news networks. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SwanderedTalent

SwanderedTalent 5761

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Capn81 said:

I think it goes deeper than politics as well. I stopped watching the shows because it was over-the-top. Everything had to have a message. Everyone had to scream. I can check my phone for scores and get highlights off of their app with less desire to vomit.

Absolutely. There's no single answer. Better, more convenient content that doesn't insult people and costs less? That's going to appeal to most people; most people will slowly migrate to it; the priority will differ for everyone.

I think it is asinine to say or imply any of those things can't be or weren't factors, and honestly I don't see how anyone can argue it without a pretty strong ulterior motive-- i.e., "sure ESPN got political but they got political in a way I like so I'm going to argue it didn't play a role in people tuning them out" (and thus losing a huge reason for NOT cutting their cable).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DougO

DougO 5239

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, closetojumping said:

MLB TV is the best sports channel available and I can’t even think of a close second. They cover the game from all angles and play nothing but highlights, games, commentary and analysis on the season, and baseball films. 

Anyone saying politics didn’t play a role in ESPN gargling balls is pushing their own bullshit agenda. 

 

I agree. I'm not even a diehard watch-everything baseball guy, but MLB is great. They do what the NFL Network formerly did before they sold out and started emphasizing more personality driven argument drek and stupid lists that mean nothing. The NFL Network has been devolving into something more ESPN-like, unfortunately, but wiht occasional glimpses of its former usefulness. I used to be glued to it every day, now I can hardly bare to watch the mostly same bullshit, different channel.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DougO

DougO 5239

Posted
Posted (edited)

Bring back the Wide World Of Sports. You know, a show about sports that is all about actual sports, some of it different stuff that we're not already bombarded with daily, some fun stuff, some foreign stuff, some just really good familier type sports action, but another level. It's just so crazy it might work. They already have the damn theme song. It doesn't even have  to be live, so it could be fairly cheap in this day and age.

Edited by DougO
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Valmy77

Valmy77 13117

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 5/24/2019 at 8:58 AM, fellside said:

As of last year, 33 million people have cancelled cable and not re-subscribed.  6 in 10 people aged 18-29 only watch streaming services. 

https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/cord-cutting-2018-estimates-33-million-us-study-1202881488/

It gets worse.  People younger than that hardly watch any live TV viewing at all.  Not even with Hulu Live or YouTubeTV.  They almost exclusively watch YouTubers or Netflix original content or old shows on Netflix.

Attributing ESPN's decline to politics is like attributing the cause of the Great Depression to Babe Ruth's dieting habits.  And no matter how may times this gets pointed out, people are going to respond with, "Yeah but ESPN let all that happen by ruining how great it used to be!"

I guess my point was they had already ruined it long before all this happened. No matter how many times I point this out, I get this response. It seems like we are having two different conversations here. Good content is still desired by all, but TV as we know it is on its way out. Those things can both be true.

ESPN could still thrive in a post-TV world if they were producing good stuff.

Edited by Valmy77
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tex Long

Tex Long 4351

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Armybrat said:

I’m still paying $200+  monthly for Spectrum (3 cable boxes around the house) we only DVR programming from maybe a dozen channels. Am not sure how this streaming stuff works. 

We do have a 4g wireless router for the tablets and new Samsung smartass 4K TV. I did finally figure out (with Surly help) how to get the Internet on said TV. Did see all those icons for the subscription services, but don’t have a clue how those work or how to pay for them.

Son with Vue says it's $70-something for pretty much everything - ESPN all but +, everything Fox has, all the xxxSports (CBS, NBC...), etc. All via your internet. I use FireStick with the very big dumb screens, and straight to 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChiTownDoc

ChiTownDoc 21102

Posted
Posted

Millennial and younger lean heavy left.  If it was "just politics" like others propose, they would still be ok.  The majority of it is that traditional TV is on it's way out with those that are younger.  I'd rather watch a strong man competition than two idiots yelling at each other about whatever soap opera they're trying to promote.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DougO

DougO 5239

Posted
Posted

The political stuff was just an extension of their longstanding narcissism that grew exponentially over the past couple of decades. ESPN jumped the shark long before they started handing woman of the year awards to trannies and such.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ButtFumble

ButtFumble 5159

Posted
Posted

once again why ESPN sucks cocks

they have 7 NCAA games LIVE right now on ESPN3 (their shit quality streaming) and one that is not even on it

and this is the dog shit they are showing on ESPN and ESPN II

NFL Live from 2 to 3 on ESPN then again from 2 to 3 on ESPN II.......fucking NFL?

then all their shitty talking asshole shows mixed in there

ESPN and ESPN II are the MTv and MTv2 of sports

2z8waiu.png

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...