Jump to content

impeachment inquiry hearings thread

henrygandorf

By henrygandorf
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

TexasEd
TexasEd

I voted for Trump/Against Hilary Clinton.   He should be impeached for: Extortion of a foreign government by withholding military assistance to an ally (and benefitting Russia) in exchange

Paul Wesley
Paul Wesley

I'm a couple pages back in this fast-moving thread, but I wanted to respond to this.   I'm pretty close to you in demographics, and I was also a child who echoed his parents' pro-Reagan stance, a

Tailgate
Tailgate

Unreal. Biden’s son can take home $1m a year from a Ukrainian company he knows nothing about...but our president acts like the CEO of a company with leverage in cutting deals and this shit happens?

Posted Images

Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45491

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

For those that missed it, Mr. Nunes "regretted to inform"  the two witnesses he's questioning this afternoon that TV ratings for the impeachment hearings were down, as if the two gentlemen were there to get their 15 minutes:

 

He's such a perfect trumpkin.  How do these people not see what buffoons they are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Reeves

Doc Reeves 6434

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

He's such a perfect trumpkin.  How do these people not see what buffoons they are?


Like I said, just remember the MJ trial 
 

Roughly 1/6 of people just won’t budge regardless of evidence.  Like if an asteroid were headed for earth ala “Armageddon” or “Deep Impact” roughly 15-20% of people would just choose denial. 
 

it’s like that crazy old timer who wouldn’t leave his lodge on Mt. St. Helens in 1980. 
 

Edited by Doc Reeves
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45491

Posted
Posted
Just now, Doc Reeves said:


Like I said, just remember the OJ and MJ trials. 
 

Roughly 1/6 of people just won’t budge regardless of evidence.  Like if an asteroid were headed for earth ala “Armageddon” or “Deep Impact” roughly 15-20% of people would just choose denial. 
 

it’s like that crazy old timer who wouldn’t leave his lodge on Mt. St. Helens in 1980. 
 

I'll take meteor if we continue on this trajectory.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89409

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

The blonde behind Castor is getting a lot of face time on PBS. 

https://heavy.com/news/2019/11/meghan-green/

Quote

Meghan Green is the blonde woman who is sitting behind House Intelligence Committee Republican counsel Steve Castor during the impeachment inquiry. 

According to Green’s LinkedIn page, she is currently the senior counsel, permanent select committee on intelligence at U.S. House of Representatives. Green, 27, has been in the role since March 2019. Previously, Green worked on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, alongside Castor. Between September 2017 and January 2019, Green worked as Counsel on the Subcommittee on Information Technology, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Green’s first job on the hill was as a law clerk for the oversight committee, according to her LinkedIn page.


spacer.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89409

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

What's happening there over Morrison's left shoulder?  I see about half an eye and a lot of blond hair.

Are you talking about the senior counsel, permanent select committee on intelligence at U.S. House of Representatives, who is 27 years old?

also, Morrison’s counsel just slapped down Castor, LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chuckie Finster

Chuckie Finster 22598

Posted
Posted

Kept the CSPAN feed on and Meadows just answered a question "off the record" while the camera was on him, lol.

Basically said it's no big deal that Ukraine still hasn't gotten all of the aid yet, and that happens all of the time.  Framed it to the woman who asked the question as "just trying to help you as a journalist."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27442

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, atomheartbevo said:

Not her?

https://www.linkedin.com/in/meghan-green-69977263

spacer.png

Homegirl got her law license in 2017, how in the fuck does she qualify as "senior counsel" with less than three years of experience practicing law as a barred attorney? Perhaps that is a clue as to why the GOP questioning is so poor lol. She also lists "microsoft office" as a skill on her linkedin profile, which is some undergrad shit lmao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DigglerontheHoof

DigglerontheHoof 21053

Posted
Posted
Just now, Captainant said:

Homegirl got her law license in 2017, how in the fuck does she qualify as "senior counsel" with less than three years of experience practicing law as a barred attorney? Perhaps that is a clue as to why the GOP questioning is so poor lol. She also lists "microsoft office" as a skill on her linkedin profile, which is some undergrad shit lmao.

She, likely, has a certain set of skills. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45546

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Homegirl got her law license in 2017, how in the fuck does she qualify as "senior counsel" with less than three years of experience practicing law as a barred attorney? Perhaps that is a clue as to why the GOP questioning is so poor lol. She also lists "microsoft office" as a skill on her linkedin profile, which is some undergrad shit lmao.

Plus, USC 'cocks cheerleader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27442

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

Y’all are being sexist ding dongs, FYI.

 

Don't disagree and didn't mean to imply a special set of "skills" that earned her that role. Merely noting that anybody in any field with fewer than three years of professional experience are usually "associate" and not "senior"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lemonlime

lemonlime 5503

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Captainant said:

Don't disagree and didn't mean to imply a special set of "skills" that earned her that role. Merely noting that anybody in any field with fewer than three years of professional experience are usually "associate" and not "senior"

Yeah, but the reason someone 3 years out could be "senior" in this case is likely that no qualified attorneys would really want to be litigating this case for the Gym Jordan/Nunes circus.   I can't imagine many good, qualified, senior litigators think that doing the GOP questioning here would actually be good for their career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...