Jump to content

impeachment inquiry hearings thread

henrygandorf

By henrygandorf
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

TexasEd
TexasEd

I voted for Trump/Against Hilary Clinton.   He should be impeached for: Extortion of a foreign government by withholding military assistance to an ally (and benefitting Russia) in exchange

Paul Wesley
Paul Wesley

I'm a couple pages back in this fast-moving thread, but I wanted to respond to this.   I'm pretty close to you in demographics, and I was also a child who echoed his parents' pro-Reagan stance, a

Tailgate
Tailgate

Unreal. Biden’s son can take home $1m a year from a Ukrainian company he knows nothing about...but our president acts like the CEO of a company with leverage in cutting deals and this shit happens?

Posted Images

Tom

Tom 2959

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, Horn Dog said:

So if my wife walks in the bedroom and im in bed with a mistress, as long as I yell out “No sex, No blow job, I only want innocent friendship” then I am good? 

 

If she votes GOP you should be fine.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pepper brooks

pepper brooks 579

Posted
Posted

this is what quid pro quo looks like. 

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/27/flashback_2018_joe_biden_brags_at_cfr_meeting_about_withholding_aid_to_ukraine_to_force_firing_of_prosecutor.html

 

I want the sworn testimony of:

Trump

SOS

Pence

Joe Biden

Hunter Biden

Leadership involved from Ukraine who had anything to do with this. 

Former prosecutor who was fired in Ukraine

 

I want anyone proven to have committed a crime punished.  I do not care which side they're one.  

  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17420

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Horn Dog said:

So if my wife walks in the bedroom and im in bed with a mistress, as long as I yell out “No sex, No blow job, I only want innocent friendship” then I am good? 

Trump didn't even do that though. He went with:

"No intercourse, no fellatio, but I will need sex and a blowjob."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17420

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, pepper brooks said:

this is what quid pro quo looks like. 

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/27/flashback_2018_joe_biden_brags_at_cfr_meeting_about_withholding_aid_to_ukraine_to_force_firing_of_prosecutor.html

 

I want the sworn testimony of:

Trump

SOS

Pence

Joe Biden

Hunter Biden

Leadership involved from Ukraine who had anything to do with this. 

Former prosecutor who was fired in Ukraine

 

I want anyone proven to have committed a crime punished.  I do not care which side they're one.  

Simple question: why did Biden, the US Government, Republicans in Congress, and our foreign allies want the prosecutor fired? Was it: (A) because he was actively pursing against Burisma or (B) because he wasn't actively pursuing the case against Burisma? Don't hurt yourself trying to answer it.  

Edited by Dahobbs
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12791

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, pepper brooks said:

this is what quid pro quo looks like. 

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/27/flashback_2018_joe_biden_brags_at_cfr_meeting_about_withholding_aid_to_ukraine_to_force_firing_of_prosecutor.html

 

I want the sworn testimony of:

Trump

SOS

Pence

Joe Biden

Hunter Biden

Leadership involved from Ukraine who had anything to do with this. 

Former prosecutor who was fired in Ukraine

 

I want anyone proven to have committed a crime punished.  I do not care which side they're one.  

No you don’t. You want to throw shit at the wall and see if it sticks. Fuck off with your bullshit comparison.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huckleberry

Huckleberry 32694

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, pepper brooks said:

this is what quid pro quo looks like. 

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/27/flashback_2018_joe_biden_brags_at_cfr_meeting_about_withholding_aid_to_ukraine_to_force_firing_of_prosecutor.html

 

I want the sworn testimony of:

Trump

SOS

Pence

Joe Biden

Hunter Biden

Leadership involved from Ukraine who had anything to do with this. 

Former prosecutor who was fired in Ukraine

 

I want anyone proven to have committed a crime punished.  I do not care which side they're one.  

Hi, I pop into CR threads from time to time to point out things I think are bad for Democrats. I only complain about Democrats. Here is an example that's not as good as I think it is but it's about a Democrat.

Also, I don't care which side they're on.

The best part? I think people actually believe my bullshit.

  • Like 8
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pepper brooks

pepper brooks 579

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, hobbes2702 said:

No you don’t. You want to throw shit at the wall and see if it sticks. Fuck off with your bullshit comparison.

so one example of quid pro quo that is 100% proof of illegal activity is a bullshit comparison to one where there is virtually no evidence of quid pro quo, and I am the one who doesn't want the truth?   we've had weeks of testimony and not one person has any verifiable proof it happened.  today we got a "I presumed", and then contradictory testimony saying he was never instructed by anyone to threaten to pull aid.  

 

uh...okay.  I am more than fine with requiring trump to testify, biden et al testifying.  you either want to eliminate all corruption or you do not.  I see you do not.  carry on.  

  • Like 3
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pepper brooks

pepper brooks 579

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Huckleberry said:

Hi, I pop into CR threads from time to time to point out things I think are bad for Democrats. I only complain about Democrats. Here is an example that's not as good as I think it is but it's about a Democrat.

Also, I don't care which side they're on.

The best part? I think people actually believe my bullshit.

don't care if you believe it or not.  I basically despise all politicians so I am fine with corruption being forced out of our process.  Seems I am pretty much alone in that view.  

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pepper brooks

pepper brooks 579

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I can only assume that dipshits like pepper brooks get their talking points off Rush Limbaugh and then run here to post their hot takes.

Late out of the blocks and then slow on the track is a really bad way to approach the race, pepper.  For fuck's sake.

so biden didn't commit quid pro quo is your take away from his own words about withholding aid until a guy investigating his kid was fired.  that is your position?

Edited by pepper brooks
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 104537

Posted
Posted
so one example of quid pro quo that is 100% proof of illegal activity is a bullshit comparison to one where there is virtually no evidence of quid pro quo, and I am the one who doesn't want the truth?   we've had weeks of testimony and not one person has any verifiable proof it happened.  today we got a "I presumed", and then contradictory testimony saying he was never instructed by anyone to threaten to pull aid.  
 
uh...okay.  I am more than fine with requiring trump to testify, biden et al testifying.  you either want to eliminate all corruption or you do not.  I see you do not.  carry on.  

How is Biden’s statement about the Ukrainian prosecutor a “100% illegal” quid pro quo? Please cite the US Code provisions?

Because see...soliciting the action of a foreign state isn’t a crime. Nobody says it is. Soliciting such action in exchange for some benefit to be provided by the US isn’t a crime. There’s one distinction that makes it a crime. It’s an important one. Did Rush tel you what it is? I bet not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pepper brooks

pepper brooks 579

Posted
Posted
Just now, Huckleberry said:

Yes, you despise all politicians. From both sides of the aisle. It's clear from your posts about all politicians on one side of the aisle.

except posts ridiculing the shittiness of paul ryan, mitch mcconnell and a whole host of others from the republican side are easily found on this board.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12791

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, pepper brooks said:

so one example of quid pro quo that is 100% proof of illegal activity is a bullshit comparison to one where there is virtually no evidence of quid pro quo, and I am the one who doesn't want the truth?   we've had weeks of testimony and not one person has any verifiable proof it happened.  today we got a "I presumed", and then contradictory testimony saying he was never instructed by anyone to threaten to pull aid.  

 

uh...okay.  I am more than fine with requiring trump to testify, biden et al testifying.  you either want to eliminate all corruption or you do not.  I see you do not.  carry on.  

Just because you say it, does not make it true. 

No you want to muddy the water on what is it is not corruption. You do so by willfully ignoring facts. 

You are either purposefully trying to mislead, or you’re incapable of understanding simple concepts of corruption. Carry on

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12791

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, pepper brooks said:

so biden didn't commit quid pro quo is your take away from his own words about withholding aid until a guy investigating his kid was fired.  that is your position?

Yes, now tell us the crime.

Edited by hobbes2702
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pepper brooks

pepper brooks 579

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:


How is Biden’s statement about the Ukrainian prosecutor a “100% illegal” quid pro quo? Please cite the US Code provisions?

Because see...soliciting the action of a foreign state isn’t a crime. Nobody says it is. Soliciting such action in exchange for some benefit to be provided by the US isn’t a crime. There’s one distinction that makes it a crime. It’s an important one. Did Rush tel you what it is? I bet not.

I do not listen to rush Limbaugh.  ever.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pepper brooks

pepper brooks 579

Posted
Posted (edited)

so help my dumbass understand how getting a foreign prosecutor fired for investigating Biden's kid by withholding aid is not corruption/bribery. 

 

And I am fine with trump being removed for the same thing if proven.  proof seems thing based on testimony have seen. I understand with trump it is using a foreign government to potentially dig up dirt on a political opponent.  wait a minute....haven't we seen that somewhere recently as well?  seems we have.  

Edited by pepper brooks
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 104537

Posted
Posted
so help my dumbass understand how getting a foreign prosecutor fired for investigating Biden's kid by withholding aid is not corruption.  And I am fine with trump being removed for the same thing if proven.  proof seems thing based on testimony have seen. 

Your post states a false fact. Know which one it is? I bet you do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12791

Posted
Posted
Just now, pepper brooks said:

so help my dumbass understand how getting a foreign prosecutor fired for investigating Biden's kid by withholding aid is not corruption.  And I am fine with trump being removed for the same thing if proven.  proof seems thing based on testimony have seen. 

All you have to do is tell us which law was broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mo Horn

Mo Horn 8807

Posted
Posted

Don't get me wrong, I love the fact that we got direct testimony that a quid pro quo happened. But, let's not forget that there never needed to be one in the first place to prove there was an impeachable offense. Yes it makes it easier for the average person to get on board but it isn't needed. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleChest

SizzleChest 8275

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, pepper brooks said:

so help my dumbass understand how getting a foreign prosecutor fired for investigating Biden's kid by withholding aid is not corruption.  And I am fine with trump being removed for the same thing if proven.  proof seems thing based on testimony have seen. 

Because it was consistent with official US policy, including the support of Congress, you waterhead.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TexArcher

TexArcher 37506

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, pepper brooks said:

so help my dumbass understand how getting a foreign prosecutor fired for investigating Biden's kid by withholding aid is not corruption.  And I am fine with trump being removed for the same thing if proven.  proof seems thing based on testimony have seen. 

Go start a "Biden did it, too" thread.

You're not gonna "Squirrel!" this thread into a topic change.

We're here to talk about how, why, and when your boy is getting impeached.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pepper brooks

pepper brooks 579

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, sidis said:

You guys are arguing with someone who spent eight straight fucking years from 2009-2016 throwing around histrionics regarding deficit spending and the national debt who conspicuously disappeared on the issue right around January 2017. 

nah.  still fighting the fight on that one.  I won't be voting for trump nor any incumbent in 2020 based on their fiscal mismanagement.  it's just not worth the energy, but rest assured I am still bitterly disappointed in the right for failing at every turn to attempt any fiscal responsibility.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...