Elizabeth Warren 2020

[Js1 86,926]

They don’t believe science. So it’s fake 

[Buzzrock 15,115]

Hopefully now they’ll drop it.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23,367]

7 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

The problem is that the Republicans aren't concerned with facts and evidence. They create their own reality. Karl Rove said as much and Trump is the poster child for the practice. They're the party of "alternative facts." They will simply dismiss the results of the test as false and their base will fall in line. 

 

2 minutes ago, Js1 said:

They don’t believe science. So it’s fake 

They are incapable of admitting fault because...

 

[Celery Man 21,076]

So the whole "Pocahontas" thing was just because "she can't be part Native American - look at her"?

[GRHorn 105]

I think y’all are missing the point here  

So my DNA test showed I’m 0.3% Sub Saharan African. 1/300. Do I get to claim any minority privilege now? 

[Tom 2,960]

Obama is still a native Kenyan even though he produced a birth certificate.

Beto O'Rourke is still pandering for Latino votes even though there is proof he's had that nickname since he was a small child.

There is a zero percent chance Trump or Republicans drop the Pocahontas shtick.  There's no interest in truth there.

[RPM 26,559]

1 minute ago, GRHorn said:

I think y’all are missing the point here  

So my DNA test showed I’m 0.3% Sub Saharan African. 1/300. Do I get to claim any minority privilege now? 

Did your grandmother tell you you were 1/300 Sub Saharan?

[GRHorn 105]

I have exciting news. If you count me we now have one more African American conservative.  I can be the counter balance to Pancho. Y’all are ok with that right?

[Tom 2,960]

2 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

I think y’all are missing the point here  

So my DNA test showed I’m 0.3% Sub Saharan African. 1/300. Do I get to claim any minority privilege now? 

 

You're missing the point that she's never received any privilege from claiming she has some Native American heritage.  And you also seem to have glossed over the part where her Native lineage lines up exactly where she thought it was.

[RPM 26,559]

1 minute ago, GRHorn said:

If you count me we now have one more African American conservative.

Show me the DNA test.

[Tom 2,960]

I hope they keep up with the Pocahontas thing.  Anyone that thinks that's a real issue for her isn't going to vote for her anyway, and it also means they have nothing of substance to attack her on.

[GRHorn 105]

1 minute ago, Tom said:

 

You're missing the point that she's never received any privilege from claiming she has some Native American heritage.  And you also seem to have glossed over the part where her Native lineage lines up exactly where she thought it was.

IIRC it was listed by Harvard as a feather in their cap to have that listed. It lines up?  It said somewhere between 6-10 generations ago.  Wide range. 

 

5 minutes ago, RPM said:

Did your grandmother tell you you were 1/300 Sub Saharan?

No, but I’m gonna do some digging, thanks. 

[phdhorn 6,224]

2 minutes ago, Tom said:

You're missing the point that she's never received any privilege from claiming she has some Native American heritage. 

In other words, she's a lousy liar.

I can't vote for any politician who isn't a good liar.  They're all one or the other.

Anyway, if all the Dems can muster up in 2020 is this old lying, shrill-voiced hen, they deserved to get buried - again.  For the love of god, get someone who actually is a good candidate.

[Celery Man 21,076]

were you an Obama birther too?

[GRHorn 105]

2 minutes ago, Tom said:

I hope they keep up with the Pocahontas thing.  Anyone that thinks that's a real issue for her isn't going to vote for her anyway, and it also means they have nothing of substance to attack her on.

I agree with Ian Bremmer, the globalist establishment liberal. 

[GRHorn 105]

Just now, Celery Man said:

were you an Obama birther too?

Me?  No, that was stupid. 

[Celery Man 21,076]

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/df48372d-0e8c-42b5-ba9b-e8ab61bd9802

[Tom 2,960]

7 minutes ago, phdhorn said:

In other words, she's a lousy liar.

I can't vote for any politician who isn't a good liar.  They're all one or the other.

Anyway, if all the Dems can muster up in 2020 is this old lying, shrill-voiced hen, they deserved to get buried - again.  For the love of god, get someone who actually is a good candidate.

 

Impossible since there is no Democratic candidate that you would consider "good."

How is she a liar?

Edited October 15, 2018 by Tom

[GRHorn 105]

17 minutes ago, RPM said:

Show me the DNA test.

 

 

 

[Fozzz 152]

I thought Obama was an Islamist Marxist hell bent on destroying the United States and enslaving the white race...until he released his birth certificate.  Then I became a supporter.  

[Js1 86,926]

14 minutes ago, Tom said:

 

Impossible since there is no Democratic candidate that you would consider "good."

How is she a liar?

"shrill voiced"

Might as well just admit he will never vote for a woman.  Can't stand being "lectured" by a "shrill-voiced" bitch

[Celery Man 21,076]

4 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

 

 

 

almost 10% socialist, can't be trusted

[RPM 26,559]

[RPM 26,559]

FWIW, that isn't my DNA results. But you wouldn't know that because internet.

[52-80 19,379]

2 minutes ago, RPM said:

you dirty non-specific.

[Hank Kingsley 21,598]

22 minutes ago, phdhorn said:

In other words, she's a lousy liar.

I can't vote for any politician who isn't a good liar.  They're all one or the other.

Anyway, if all the Dems can muster up in 2020 is this old lying, shrill-voiced hen, they deserved to get buried - again.  For the love of god, get someone who actually is a good candidate.

Republicans: "We found one little thing about Elizabeth Warren we'll run into the ground, and claim the high road. Yeah, you might think a small issue like this deserves a free pass, but we have standards when it comes to Democratic candidates."

Also Republicans: "Yes, I will vote for the Arby's cup of diarrhea again in 2020. MAGA."

 

[RPM 26,559]

1 minute ago, 52-80 said:

you dirty non-specific.

2%er

[atomheartbevo 90,542]

42 minutes ago, Tom said:

I hope they keep up with the Pocahontas thing.  Anyone that thinks that's a real issue for her isn't going to vote for her anyway, and it also means they have nothing of substance to attack her on.

They will keep it up.  They are tone-deaf when it comes to women and minorities, and they reinforce it on a daily basis. 

[Celery Man 21,076]

moving the racial purity goal posts is very on brand

[Hugo Stiglitz 23,367]

Elizabeth Warren wants them to keep calling her Pocahontas.  

This is the fight she wants because it makes them look stupid 

[GSU&UT 1,799]

51 minutes ago, phdhorn said:

In other words, she's a lousy liar.

I can't vote for any politician who isn't a good liar.  They're all one or the other.

Anyway, if all the Dems can muster up in 2020 is this old lying, shrill-voiced hen, they deserved to get buried - again.  For the love of god, get someone who actually is a good candidate.

God, inject this "both sides equally bad" right into my veins.

[GSU&UT 1,799]

Like how much of a choad do you have to be in order to believe knuckle-dragger right wing talking points that claim she's a liar and therefore you wouldn't vote for her? Oh wait, you're just being disingenuous because you would never vote for a Democrat, much less a female Democrat candidate who doesn't listen to being told to shut up.

Edited October 15, 2018 by GSU&UT

[Kilgorehorn 308]

11 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

This is the fight she wants because it makes them look stupid 

Narrator: They are.

[RPM 26,559]

12 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

This is the fight she wants because it makes them look stupid 

Well, to be completely fair, she's right.

[RPM 26,559]

Warren is everything the "conservatives" hate. She's in favor of consumer protections and prosecuting Wall Street bankers.

[Asithappens 978]

2 minutes ago, RPM said:

Warren is everything the "conservatives" hate. She's in favor of consumer protections and prosecuting Wall Street bankers.

Warren has no shot, imo. She comes across as too shrill and whiny. Moreso than HRC. 

Maybe VP material. 

[RPM 26,559]

What you see as "whiny and shrill" I see as smart and defiant.

[seven 1,368]

Trump had no problem winning while being shrill and whiny

[HenryJames 67,115]

46 minutes ago, RPM said:

[GSU&UT 1,799]

3 minutes ago, RPM said:

What you see as "whiny and shrill" I see as smart and defiant.

He just doesn't want to vote for a woman who doesn't put up with bullshit.

[Hank Kingsley 21,598]

9 minutes ago, Asithappens said:

Warren has no shot, imo. She comes across as too shrill and whiny. Moreso than HRC. 

Maybe VP material. 

Weird how women are always the ones described as "shrill and whiny". 

Trump has the vocabulary and temperament of a 8 year old but according to Rs "he talks like me.".  

Just fucking burn it all down. 

 

 

[Asithappens 978]

Just now, Hank Kingsley said:

Weird how women are always the ones described as "shrill and whiny". 

Not weird at all.

Especially when she is shrill and whiny. 

 

 

 

[Turkleton 145]

8 minutes ago, seven said:

Trump had no problem winning while being shrill and whiny

This is true, but look who he was going against.

[Hank Kingsley 21,598]

1 minute ago, Asithappens said:

Not weird at all.

Especially when she is shrill and whiny. 

You're right, it's not weird. It's dumb and sexist. 

 

[GRHorn 105]

Nice headline.  

BREAKING:  GRHorn releases his DNA test:  Yes, he is African American. 

[Asithappens 978]

3 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

You're right, it's not weird. It's dumb and sexist. 

 

Maybe sexist. But not necessarily dumb. It's a social/gender-based convention. If you want to tilt at that windmill, then go ahead. I won't say that you're wrong, other than saying it's not weird that women are primarily the gender that gets called "shrill and whiny". It's fairly commonplace. 

Edited October 15, 2018 by Asithappens

[David Dennison 19,440]

15 minutes ago, Turkleton said:

This is true, but look who he was going against.

He's much more shrill and whiny than Hillary.

Just sayin'.

[Pescado_Rojo 19,556]

1 hour ago, GRHorn said:

 

 

 

So your Great, Great, Great Grandmother...

[Hugo Stiglitz 23,367]

Talk about Warren not having a shot to beat Trump is really silly when you consider all the voices saying Trump had no chance to beat Hillary in 2016. 

Warren is everything Hillary should have been without the baggage.

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Talk about Warren not having a shot to beat Trump is really silly when you consider all the voices saying Trump had no chance to beat Hillary in 2016. 

Warren is everything Hillary should have been without the baggage.

She has a ton of baggage. Maybe not to you or others on this board, I agree. But I think she wouldn’t play well in real life when it was nut cutting time.