Jump to content

so, Jeffrey Epstein

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted

Somewhat humorous 2008 review of “Space Relations.” - 

Instead, the plot focuses on the torrid romance between John Craig (slave) and Lady Morgan (his owner). The author also explores (crashes through the underbrush, really) the issues of slavery and domination.

The result is a frustrating and ponderous read. Barr aggressively pursues character development instead of world-building, but since his characters neither grow nor change, it is merely a prolonged sketch of two fairly obnoxious people.

His exploration of slavery is neither sensitive nor telling. Despite repeatedly and officiously informing the reader that slavery is wrong at every turn (go figure), Barr creates two openly "superior" characters as his leads. Craig and Morgan freely kill, torture, seduce and make sweeping political decisions on behalf of thousands of people - but this is acceptable, because they're somehow imbued with "natural heroism". Slavery and oppression are wrong, unless you're someone as wise and talented as Craig or Morgan, in which you're perfectly justified in forcing decisions on other people.

An expression of this natural superiority is Craig's unbelievably irritating habit of composing poetry. Clearly intended to add to the depth of the novel, what begins as an annoying, occasional snippet soon becomes a field of lyrical land-mines. This practice is especially painful in the middle of the book, as the reader is forced to plow through sonnets on every other page. As a result, Space Relations is one of the most picture-perfect expressions of Tolkien's Law ("Always skip the poetry") that I've ever read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bullneck
Bullneck
TexArcher
TexArcher

I love how some guy said Bill Clinton likes 'em young, which could mean any woman under 50, so he's clearly a pedo, but like 16 women accused Trump of rape, and he's facing almost a hundred felony cha

Red Five
Red Five

Ariana Grande, IMO.

Posted Images

SquishMitten

SquishMitten 10403

Posted
Posted
Why would he do that? In his twisted mind he wasn't doing anything wrong. He's dead so blackmail is kind of useless now.


It’s like you’ve never read a book. The blackmailer gives everything to a third party and tells the blackmailees that their deeds will instantly be revealed if he ever dies. It provides protection to the blackmailer. It’s not because of a self-righteous feeling to bring down other bad guys from the grave.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28734

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

If you draw the line all the way up the chain of command ultimately Donald trump, as the person in charge of the executive branch of the federal government, was in charge of Epstein’s safety and we’ll being. 

So of course he’s dead. And just like the people in El Paso, the moron Trumpkins will absolve dear leader of all responsibility.

#trumpbodycount 

Yep. I was firmly in the camp of, "I'm not going to assume Trump or Clinton (or anyone else) is guilty until the evidence says so or there are specific allegations." In a perfect world they'd both be innocent. There are a lot of reasons to hang out with a rich guy who might donate to your cause that don't require you partaking in sexual abuse, and as many reasons to look the other way if things appeared a little strange. 

Bu this is, at the very least, a massive failure on the part of the federal government. The fact that it benefits some of the major players in the federal government and comes at the perfect time when Trump is heading off on vacation for ten days would appear to be a massively improbable coincidence. Something stinks. I'm now more inclined to believe Trump has something to hide than I was before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, SquishMitten said:

 


It’s like you’ve never read a book. The blackmailer gives everything to a third party and tells the blackmailees that their deeds will instantly be revealed if he ever dies. It provides protection to the blackmailer. It’s not because of a self-righteous feeling to bring down other bad guys from the grave.

 

Can’t rule out the possibility Epstein was the third party guy working on behalf of a foreign government that was blackmailing/protecting him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Yep. I was firmly in the camp of, "I'm not going to assume Trump or Clinton (or anyone else) is guilty until the evidence says so or there are specific allegations." In a perfect world they'd both be innocent. There are a lot of reasons to hang out with a rich guy who might donate to your cause that don't require you partaking in sexual abuse, and as many reasons to look the other way if things appeared a little strange. 

Bu this is, at the very least, a massive failure on the part of the federal government. The fact that it benefits some of the major players in the federal government and comes at the perfect time when Trump is heading off on vacation for ten days would appear to be a massively improbable coincidence. Something stinks. I'm now more inclined to believe Trump has something to hide than I was before. 

It is such a massive failure that it can only be intentional.

But no worry, the author of “Space relations” son, also the guy who coincidentally gave Epstein his first job that he clearly wasn’t qualified for,  is on the case.

No doubt AG Barr will investigate this matter and ultimately conclude that while “mistakes were made” that it does not go beyond that at all. And certainly doesn’t implicate him or trump. 

You sheeple can construct all the wild ass conspiracy theories you want, but AG Barr has made his determination and you will accept it. Because that is that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Whiggins

Mrs Whiggins 13049

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

I'm not saying that there shouldn't be wealthy people. I don't know what I'd do with 100s of millions of dollars, but I'd just as soon not be tempted to do whatever is possible  with that kind of dough or what my heirs might do with it.

If the men named in the article are guilty, my guess is that none of them were pedophiles to start out with. Power, influence, and/or filthy wealth enabled the development of criminal tastes which can create disgusting criminal enterprises like the one we see here.

I disagree with part of your statement. The "none" part.

As to the development of criminal tastes, has anyone examined if Epstein had any Russian mob connections? They are masters at human trafficking. This is such a tangled web, the swamp gas is getting to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gatorubet

Gatorubet 30167

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Wyatt Mann said:

The latest Clinton associate dead by "suicide". I guess he can't incriminate anyone else now.

Clinton is not running for POTUS. Epstein's buddy Trump is. You know - the POTUS who says that Jeffrey liked his girls young....

 

So, no, not the guy who has the most to lose. He's not a suspect, but Vince Foster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pato del Muerto

Pato del Muerto 52417

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Clinton is not running for POTUS. Epstein's buddy Trump is. You know - the POTUS who says that Jeffrey liked his girls young....

 

So, no, not the guy who has the most to lose. He's not a suspect, but Vince Foster.

The clintons have plenty to lose. 

One thing this should illustrate to everyone is that the wealthy take care of their own using wealth and power, and they make sure that we get to choose between two of them in all important elections so that their needs are seen to at all times. R vs D is the slight of hand used to distract us while they go about their business. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28734

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Pato del Muerto said:

The clintons have plenty to lose. 

One thing this should illustrate to everyone is that the wealthy take care of their own using wealth and power, and they make sure that we get to choose between two of them in all important elections so that their needs are seen to at all times. R vs D is the slight of hand used to distract us while they go about their business. 

The Clintons aren't that wealthy. We know because they release their tax returns. They weren't born rich. They're self-made. They're about as wealthy as you'd expect them to be given their long and distinguished careers. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RDCanecutter

RDCanecutter 26350

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Chooky said:

Yesterday it was impossible that things could ever get dumber, but with recent developments, things will get even dumber than the former threshold of maximum dumbness. And there is mounting evidence that only the truly dumb thought it couldn't get dumber. 

I don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chooky

Chooky 13304

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mdmost said:

ShitLibs, huh?

It's like Mad Libs but you fill every blank with the word shit.  "No Christmas season is shit unless you have a shit tree decorated with shit in your family's shit room. Santa Claus won't bring shit to children who have been shit."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trey3216

Trey3216 15325

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Xian said:

I don’t know why some of y’all are so intent on blaming either Clinton OR trump. 

 

Its fucking both of them. Plus al gore, prince Andrew and a shitload of other people who have been listed.   They are all horribly corrupt and horrible people  

“O, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive” 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
McCroskey

McCroskey 1504

Posted
Posted (edited)

Dude was most likely murdered.

The odds that it is in any way tied to Trump are in my opinion hysterically low.  For starters, as HARD as the MSM and Anti-Trumpers have been throwing resources and looking for ANYTHING to take the guy down, this story of Epstein and his prior relationship with Trump is far too old and clearly it's been hashed through to the fullest extent possible, and the ONLY reason you haven't heard anything beyond that is that as far as Trump was involved, nothing was there except a single quote about Epstein liking women younger that Trump preferred.  Rest assured, Epstein would have long ago been quickly sacrificed and given up to authorities had there been some legitimate link that Trump was involved in.  This wasn't Trump's doing, and LOL if you think it is.

IMO, the two most likely scenarios are that this was a hit aimed at protecting the Clinton legacy and name (by design the odds of them having any direct knowledge or traceable ties to this are virtually zero at this point), or it was a hit from MI-6 to protect Queen Elizabeth's youngest son and their family.  If I were a betting man, I'd go with the Clinton's as being the most likely culprits, purely given the fact that the #ClintonBodyCount is absolutely a real, tangible thing.

Edited by McCroskey
  • Like 4
  • Fuck You 18
Link to comment
Share on other sites
deech

deech 2255

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, McCroskey said:

Dude was most likely murdered.

The odds that it is in any way tied to Trump are in my opinion hysterically low.  For starters, as HARD as the MSM and Anti-Trumpers have been throwing resources and looking for ANYTHING to take the guy down, this story of Epstein and his prior relationship with Trump is far too old and clearly it's been hashed through to the fullest extent possible, and the ONLY reason you haven't heard anything beyond that is that as far as Trump was involved, nothing was there except a single quote about Epstein liking women younger that Trump preferred.  Rest assured, Epstein would have long ago been quickly sacrificed and given up to authorities had there been some legitimate link that Trump was involved in.  This wasn't Trump's doing, and LOL if you think it is.

IMO, the two most likely scenarios are that this was a hit aimed at protecting the Clinton legacy and name (by design the odds of them having any direct knowledge or traceable ties to this are virtually zero at this point), or it was a hit from MI-6 to protect Queen Elizabeth's youngest son and their family.  If I were a betting man, I'd go with the Clinton's as being the most likely culprits, purely given the fact that the #ClintonBodyCount is absolutely a real, tangible thing.

Thanks for the brilliant insight.

 

Benedict-Cumberbatch-as-S-011.jpg?width=

Edited by deech
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12995

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, McCroskey said:

Dude was most likely murdered.

The odds that it is in any way tied to Trump are in my opinion hysterically low.  For starters, as HARD as the MSM and Anti-Trumpers have been throwing resources and looking for ANYTHING to take the guy down, this story of Epstein and his prior relationship with Trump is far too old and clearly it's been hashed through to the fullest extent possible, and the ONLY reason you haven't heard anything beyond that is that as far as Trump was involved, nothing was there except a single quote about Epstein liking women younger that Trump preferred.  Rest assured, Epstein would have long ago been quickly sacrificed and given up to authorities had there been some legitimate link that Trump was involved in.  This wasn't Trump's doing, and LOL if you think it is.

IMO, the two most likely scenarios are that this was a hit aimed at protecting the Clinton legacy and name (by design the odds of them having any direct knowledge or traceable ties to this are virtually zero at this point), or it was a hit from MI-6 to protect Queen Elizabeth's youngest son and their family.  If I were a betting man, I'd go with the Clinton's as being the most likely culprits, purely given the fact that the #ClintonBodyCount is absolutely a real, tangible thing.

Where do you stand on pizzagate

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Lange

Ted Lange 16070

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, McCroskey said:

Dude was most likely murdered.

The odds that it is in any way tied to Trump are in my opinion hysterically low.  For starters, as HARD as the MSM and Anti-Trumpers have been throwing resources and looking for ANYTHING to take the guy down, this story of Epstein and his prior relationship with Trump is far too old and clearly it's been hashed through to the fullest extent possible, and the ONLY reason you haven't heard anything beyond that is that as far as Trump was involved, nothing was there except a single quote about Epstein liking women younger that Trump preferred.  Rest assured, Epstein would have long ago been quickly sacrificed and given up to authorities had there been some legitimate link that Trump was involved in.  This wasn't Trump's doing, and LOL if you think it is.

IMO, the two most likely scenarios are that this was a hit aimed at protecting the Clinton legacy and name (by design the odds of them having any direct knowledge or traceable ties to this are virtually zero at this point), or it was a hit from MI-6 to protect Queen Elizabeth's youngest son and their family.  If I were a betting man, I'd go with the Clinton's as being the most likely culprits, purely given the fact that the #ClintonBodyCount is absolutely a real, tangible thing.

Anyone who thinks Trump was involved or had anything to do with Epstein is a crazy person, peddling conspiracy theories....Here is my crazy person conspiracy theory on the Clintons!

 

Fucking LOL   SAD!

  • Like 7
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...