Jump to content

so, Jeffrey Epstein

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

RomaVicta

RomaVicta 30509

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, GRHorn said:

Hey dumbass, pretty sure the tweet was referring to gang rape allegations by Julie Swetnick and her star attorney Michael Avenatti. Uncorroborated, but media ran with it immediately.  

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/kavanaugh-accuser-julie-swetnick-speaks-out-sexual-abuse-allegations-n915641

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/michael-avenatti-client-allegations-kavanaugh/story?id=58097092

Wonder how that met their high “editorial standards”?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/10/brett-kavanaugh-gang-rape-claim-falls-apart/

He can't be a sexual molester/rapist if he didn't molest or rape everybody that raised the allegation? And I'm the dumbass? 

It's your right to be disingenuous. It's sort of your habit, too. I'm sure I speak for all dumbasses when I say that we look forward to your future posts. We will likely give you positive rep as well. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bullneck
Bullneck
TexArcher
TexArcher

I love how some guy said Bill Clinton likes 'em young, which could mean any woman under 50, so he's clearly a pedo, but like 16 women accused Trump of rape, and he's facing almost a hundred felony cha

Red Five
Red Five

Ariana Grande, IMO.

Posted Images

bolverk

bolverk 30247

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

He can't be a sexual molester/rapist if he didn't molest or rape everybody that raised the allegation? And I'm the dumbass? 

It's your right to be disingenuous. It's sort of your habit, too. I'm sure I speak for all dumbasses when I say that we look forward to your future posts. We will likely give you positive rep as well. 

Following his brain's logic pattern is a bit like wandering a carnival funhouse. It can be entertaining or terrorizing or both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GRHorn

GRHorn 105

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

He can't be a sexual molester/rapist if he didn't molest or rape everybody that raised the allegation? And I'm the dumbass? 

I missed where I said anything of the sort. Try again. 
 

Did mainstream media outlets sit on stories about Weinstein and Epstein because they failed to meet their “editorial standards”? Yes.

Did the same outlets run with uncorroborated, salacious allegations by Julie Swetnick and her media darling attorney, Avenatti? Yes

That’s what the original tweet I posted was addressing.  
 

Why the double standard?

Edited by GRHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46990

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

I missed where I said anything of the sort. Try again. 
 

Did mainstream media outlets sit on stories about Weinstein and Epstein because they failed to meet their “editorial standards”? Yes.

Did the same outlets run with uncorroborated, salacious allegations by Julie Swetnick and her media darling attorney, Avenatti? Yes

That’s what the original tweet I posted was addressing.  
 

Why the double standard?

Perhaps you should address the manner in which those stories were reported and the timeliness thereof.  You know, because there was a fucking SCOTUS hearing going on and it was a central theme.

Edited by jimmyjazz
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, GRHorn said:

What a fascinating perspective. Now I know who to go to when I need someone to stand up for tort lawyers, unions, Congress, or the mainstream media. At least 3 of those are some of the most unpopular things in existence. 

Among shit for brains like yourself. That is true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bolverk

bolverk 30247

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, GRHorn said:

I missed where I said anything of the sort. Try again. 
 

Did mainstream media outlets sit on stories about Weinstein and Epstein because they failed to meet their “editorial standards”? Yes.

Did the same outlets run with uncorroborated, salacious allegations by Julie Swetnick and her media darling attorney, Avenatti? Yes

That’s what the original tweet I posted was addressing.  
 

Why the double standard?

Can we also question why the same mainstream media outlets haven't also extensively covered the two dozen(?) allegations of sexual assault made against our currently sitting president? Did they also fail to meet "editorial standards?"

I ask you, why the double standard?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Goredho

Goredho 17630

Posted
Posted

Man, Epstein's death is a fucking Rorschach test.  If you:

1.  Believe Epstein didn't just kill himself

2.  Choose to rail against the media for not running some nebulous story regarding him that may or may not be significant

3.  While making nary a peep about the criminal justice system passing this off as a suicide (which would mean they have to be part of the conspiracy to silence Epstein)

Well, that all says a shit ton more about you and your motives than it does Epstein's death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Continental Op

Continental Op 3934

Posted
Posted
Man, Epstein's death is a fucking Rorschach test.  If you:

1.  Believe Epstein didn't just kill himself
2.  Choose to rail against the media for not running some nebulous story regarding him that may or may not be significant
3.  While making nary a peep about the criminal justice system passing this off as a suicide (which would mean they have to be part of the conspiracy to silence Epstein)

Well, that all says a shit ton more about you and your motives than it does Epstein's death.
Add to that "Anyone bleating about Clinton/Trump ties to Epstein while ignoring Trump/Clinton ties to Epstein"
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Goredho

Goredho 17630

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Continental Op said:
1 hour ago, Goredho said:
Man, Epstein's death is a fucking Rorschach test.  If you:

1.  Believe Epstein didn't just kill himself
2.  Choose to rail against the media for not running some nebulous story regarding him that may or may not be significant
3.  While making nary a peep about the criminal justice system passing this off as a suicide (which would mean they have to be part of the conspiracy to silence Epstein)

Well, that all says a shit ton more about you and your motives than it does Epstein's death.

Read more  

Add to that "Anyone bleating about Clinton/Trump ties to Epstein while ignoring Trump/Clinton ties to Epstein"

Yes indeed

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EMAWesome

EMAWesome 101

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Here's the difference between the left and the right, EMAW.  If Bill Clinton or George S or any left politician was involved with Epstein's criminal behavior in any way, virtually all progressives say they should go down.  Contrast that to yourself and other alt-right shitstains who would defend Trump if he were on video fucking Ivanka, because Hillary!

Long walk, short pier, etc. etc. etc.

Bullshit, two words--Bill Clinton.  Two more words Paula Jones.  Two more words Juanita Broderick.  Two more words Monica Lewisky. Two more words Jennifer Flowers.  Do you think ABC News is run by conservatives?  The fact that they killed the story disproves your assertion point blank.

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
EMAWesome

EMAWesome 101

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, bolverk said:

So now we're going with ignoring one seemingly credible alledged assault victim of a Supreme Court nominee while focusing solely on another lesser-so one based on a tweet that doesn't specify which one in order to accuse the "lamestream media" of covering up allegations against a very rich and well-connected accused pedophile to point out that the Clinton's were the real perpetrators?

0330chewbacca.jpg

What seemingly credible alleged assault victim?  There was absolutely nothing credible about Halsey-Ford's accusations.  She couldn't remember when it happened, she couldn't remember where it happened, and every single person she claimed could confirm her accusation refused to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bolverk

bolverk 30247

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

What seemingly credible alleged assault victim?  There was absolutely nothing credible about Halsey-Ford's accusations.  She couldn't remember when it happened, she couldn't remember where it happened, and every single person she claimed could confirm her accusation refused to do so.

It's Blasey Ford, you dumb fucking hayseed. If you can't get her name right, I can't help you scroll up a few fucking posts. Go find another planet to pollute with your idiocy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46990

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Bullshit, two words--Bill Clinton.  Two more words Paula Jones.  Two more words Juanita Broderick.  Two more words Monica Lewisky. Two more words Jennifer Flowers.  Do you think ABC News is run by conservatives?  The fact that they killed the story disproves your assertion point blank.

Please tell us which of those cases survived prosecution and resulted in convictions or judgments against Bill Clinton.

Also, I encourage your dumb ass to look into Robert Iger of Disney and tell us whether or not he supports Donald Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chad Fuck

Chad Fuck 18096

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Bullshit, two words--Bill Clinton.  Two more words Paula Jones.  Two more words Juanita Broderick.  Two more words Monica Lewisky. Two more words Jennifer Flowers.  Do you think ABC News is run by conservatives?  The fact that they killed the story disproves your assertion point blank.

Did ABC not run stories on all those folks?  Because I'm pretty sure I saw the DNA stained blue dress there.  But I suppose it could've been NBC or CBS.  Or any other news media outlet of the time.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand 13619

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:

Did ABC not run stories on all those folks?  Because I'm pretty sure I saw the DNA stained blue dress there.  But I suppose it could've been NBC or CBS.  Or any other news media outlet of the time.  

I suppose we could just google any of those names and abc news and see if anything comes up.

 

 

 

Ok. I did and of course ABC covered it. Here's a semi-random hit that's semi-topical to the thread cuz it involves the guy that according to 2 sworn corroborating affidavits raped and threatened to kill a 13 year old at one of Epstein's parties.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/flashback-donald-trump-called-bill-clintons-accusers-terrible/story?id=42686582

Edited by Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hpslugga

hpslugga 4096

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, EMAWesome said:

Bullshit, two words--Bill Clinton.  Two more words Paula Jones.  Two more words Juanita Broderick.  Two more words Monica Lewisky. Two more words Jennifer Flowers.  Do you think ABC News is run by conservatives?  The fact that they killed the story disproves your assertion point blank.

Just chalk this drivel up to yet another example of a stupid fuck who couldn’t comprehend the political spectrum if his useless life depended on it. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RayDog

RayDog 682

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

You know what I’d really like to see?  Is Bill and Hillary switch and declare themselves Republicans, and start running for office.  

They are right wing enough that it would not change their place in the political spectrum much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Onboard 2.0

Onboard 2.0 9083

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

Yeah but the confusion and spectacle among Republican voters would be hilarious.

Doubtful, highly doubtful.  Hilary and Bill are the classic limo liberals. Using the promise of helping the common man to line their pockets.  It's been the tactic of democrats for decades. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CowboyFred

CowboyFred 1162

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

Doubtful, highly doubtful.  Hilary and Bill are the classic politicians. Using the promise of helping the common man to line their pockets.  It's been the tactic of politicians for centuries (probably). 

Fify

Acting like democrats are the only political party to benefit monetarily from their office.  I'm also pretty sure that was Trump's promise to the poors of the Midwest and yet Trump family and friends are the only ones that seem to be lining their pockets.  Ron Desantis says hi.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Onboard 2.0

Onboard 2.0 9083

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, JimmyJames said:

Torbush.  

That's the best you can do ?  I put it out over the plate like that, and all you can do is come back with a generationally obscure bit of slang.  I'm disappointed, I expect better from Surly.  At least Gordo had a Thujone dick pic.  

You suck at retorts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EMAWesome

EMAWesome 101

Posted
Posted (edited)

More hypocrisy from the media, when a whistleblower claims Trump did something impeachable they must be protected from retaliation.  When a whistleblower exposes the media's unwillingness to dig into the Epstein story they get tracked down and fired from another network.  

https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1192447374985252864

 

Quote

1. Scoop: ABC News execs believe they know who the former employee is who accessed footage of @arobach expressing her frustrations about her shelved Jeffrey Epstein story That former employee is now at CBS and ABC execs have reached out to CBS News execs

2. In a statement, an ABC News spokesperson tells me: "We take violations of company policy very seriously, and we’re pursuing all avenues to determine the source of the leak.”

3. It's important to note that ABC News does not know if this former employee leaked the footage to Project Veritas. What they do know is who accessed the footage. It's possible that person could have shared it with others who leaked it.

4. As I noted in this thread, ABC News has confirmed they're conducting an investigation into the leak. In response to an email, CBS News says they're declining to comment for this story.

5. Update: Two sources familiar with the matter tell me that CBS News has fired the staffer in question. This comes after ABC informed CBS that they had determined who accessed the footage of Amy Robach expressing her frustrations about the Epstein story.

Edited by EMAWesome
  • Like 3
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46990

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

More hypocrisy from the media, when a whistleblower claims Trump did something impeachable they must be protected from retaliation.  When a whistleblower exposes the media's unwillingness to dig into the Epstein story they get tracked down and fired from another network.  

Except for that part where the staffer in question accessed and leaked copyrighted material owned by the network, whereas the Trump whistleblower acted within government channels according to government policy.

Hey, keep on trying, you'll get something right one day soon.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hpslugga

hpslugga 4096

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Except for that part where the staffer in question accessed and leaked copyrighted material owned by the network, whereas the Trump whistleblower acted within government channels according to government policy.

Hey, keep on trying, you'll get something right one day soon.

He won’t. That’s his addiction

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChiTownDoc

ChiTownDoc 21326

Posted
Posted
On 11/7/2019 at 2:43 PM, EMAWesome said:

More hypocrisy from the media, when a whistleblower claims Trump did something impeachable they must be protected from retaliation.  When a whistleblower exposes the media's unwillingness to dig into the Epstein story they get tracked down and fired from another network.  

https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1192447374985252864

 

Lol, my niece told on my nephew.  Her ass got grounded too.  WHAT ABOUT WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION?!???!?!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Goredho

Goredho 17630

Posted
Posted

5dc5a124d4591eefe91c753c?ops=max(650,0),

One California brewery decided to get into the meme business and started printing "Epstein didn't kill himself" on the bottom of their cans. The manager at Tactical Ops Brewing in Fresno said he got the idea about a week ago after seeing the memes flooding his Facebook feed.

https://kogo.iheart.com/content/2019-11-08-brewery-prints-epstein-didnt-kill-himself-on-the-bottom-of-cans/?Sc=editorial&Pname=local_social&Keyid=socialflow

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...