Jump to content

so, Jeffrey Epstein

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

retread

retread 2951

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Yeah, that's the thing. Not only was Trump social with these Eastern European model "importers," he was intimately involved in many aspects of it - including where he obtained his current wife - as well as eventually owning one himself (which has been accused of bringing young women to the US illegally as "models" and treating them very poorly). Yeah, maybe Trump never made any of them sex slaves, but I find it difficult to believe that he wouldn't have known about the uglier side of the business being conducted by his party buddies.

Just like Harvey Weinstein and many others, it's very hard to think that his friends weren't aware of his activities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bullneck
Bullneck
TexArcher
TexArcher

I love how some guy said Bill Clinton likes 'em young, which could mean any woman under 50, so he's clearly a pedo, but like 16 women accused Trump of rape, and he's facing almost a hundred felony cha

Red Five
Red Five

Ariana Grande, IMO.

Posted Images

lemonlime

lemonlime 5503

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Yeah, that's the thing. Not only was Trump social with these Eastern European model "importers," he was intimately involved in many aspects of it - including where he obtained his current wife - as well as eventually owning one himself (which has been accused of bringing young women to the US illegally as "models" and treating them very poorly). Yeah, maybe Trump never made any of them sex slaves, but I find it difficult to believe that he wouldn't have known about the uglier side of the business being conducted by his party buddies.

In fairness, we're talking about someone who didn't know that airports didn't exist in 1776.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
softlynow

softlynow 1783

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, horncyclist said:

Thanks. What happened to that Jane Doe accusation? I remember the mainstream media wouldn't touch it and then the accuser declined to go public. Know of a story summing it up? This latest Epstein stuff made me think of it.

Edit: Nevermind, someone posted huff po summary below.

And don't think for a minute Trump supporters won't explain rape of a teenager away like they have everything else.

The “grass on the field” defense will keep the 40% like jhawk in line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29775

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, retread said:

Just like Harvey Weinstein and many others, it's very hard to think that his friends weren't aware of his activities.

We often see what we want to see or only what we're looking for. I doubt Weinstein or Epstein boasted of their activities to anyone who didn't similarly indulge in the same.

It's sort of like the old cliche about the serial killer next door. "He was quiet. Kinda kept to himself. Seemed like a nice guy."

It's amazing how little we actually know about the inner workings of the people we think we know well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23356

Posted
Posted

Does anyone believe Trump wasn’t tied up in this shit?  

Trump has always been a walking erection that openly talked about dating his daughter if she wasn’t his daughter. 

There’s a billionaire NYC buddy that runs an underage sex slave business and we’re supposed to believe Trump was like, “Nah, not for me.  That’s a line I won’t cross. I have high ethical standards when it comes to paying for sex.  Only porn stars and playmates for me thank you.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jhawk

Jhawk 1075

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Never intended to “get” Trump.  

Goal was to provide an alternative collection of data in case Trump illegally shut down the Russia investigation which he was busted for multiple times in the Mueller report.

Trump was got in the Mueller Report.  Just because people refuse to read or acknowledge it doesn’t mean he’s innocent of major national security crimes.   Additionally, the Mueller Report makes it clear Trump will be liable for his crimes once he’s out of office. 

You were always about "getting" trump.  If he was got then why hasn't he been impeached so they can throw him in rikers?  I'm guessing it is because the people who actually have some sort of legal background advised that going after him for anything in the Mueller report wouldn't stick.  If it is so black and white then he would at least be impeached.  Just like trump's birther movement, if it was true then everyone in congress (controlled by the repubs for a bit) would have latched on and impeached him. Instead, you have very few calls for impeachment from the sane left.  Only the radical left and people who need to "impeach trump!" for reelection call for his impeachment.  Why is that?  I thought they caught him red handed breaking the law?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fudge Nuggets

Fudge Nuggets 19146

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Lobo said:

Just google it before you pants yourself on the World Wide Web!  

When you surrender them at renewal, you can legally request the old one back.  It's not hard to slightly modify a couple things on an otherwise totally valid and legit passport.  

Quit asking dumb questions!  Gosh!  

They punch a couple of holes in the old one when they give it back to you.  Kind of makes it invalid at that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jack

Jack 51

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Does anyone believe Trump wasn’t tied up in this shit?  

Trump has always been a walking erection that openly talked about dating his daughter if she wasn’t his daughter. 

There’s a billionaire NYC buddy that runs an underage sex slave business and we’re supposed to believe Trump was like, “Nah, not for me.  That’s a line I won’t cross. I have high ethical standards when it comes to paying for sex.  Only porn stars and playmates for me thank you.”

Do you honestly not see the difference between fucking porn stars and playmates vs fucking a 14 year old? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DigglerontheHoof

DigglerontheHoof 21053

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Jhawk said:

You were always about "getting" trump.  If he was got then why hasn't he been impeached so they can throw him in rikers?  I'm guessing it is because the people who actually have some sort of legal background advised that going after him for anything in the Mueller report wouldn't stick.  If it is so black and white then he would at least be impeached.  Just like trump's birther movement, if it was true then everyone in congress (controlled by the repubs for a bit) would have latched on and impeached him. Instead, you have very few calls for impeachment from the sane left.  Only the radical left and people who need to "impeach trump!" for reelection call for his impeachment.  Why is that?  I thought they caught him red handed breaking the law?

The fact that you just compared the Cunt in Chief's birther tweets to the Mueller report tells anyone all they need to know about you.  You are ALL in on Trump.  He could rape your wife or daughter, and you'd rationalize it away.  JFC, you're pathetic. 

Edited by DigglerontheHoof
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

They punch a couple of holes in the old one when they give it back to you.  Kind of makes it invalid at that point.

If you don't have a guy that can fill in a few holes on a government document and match the background, you're not doing life right.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fudge Nuggets

Fudge Nuggets 19146

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Lobo said:

If you don't have a guy that can fill in a few holes on a government document and match the background, you're not doing life right.  

I’ll go out on a limb, but hear me out on this.  If you are going to flee the country on an altered passport, I think you spring the extra bucks and get a fake one in someone else’s name.  Call it a hunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zavala

Zavala 1384

Posted
Posted

https://www.takimag.com/article/media-magic-how-a-democrat-pedophile-became-a-trump-scandal/

wew

Quote

But when the police chief brought this mountain of evidence to Palm Beach County’s Democratic prosecutor Barry Krischer, he punted, charging the Democrat child molester with only one count of soliciting prostitution — yes, the child victims were labeled “prostitutes” — and offered Epstein probation.

Perhaps Krischer was exhausted, having just spent three years hounding Rush Limbaugh for abusing back pain medication.

Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter exploded in rage. (Meanwhile, Epstein claimed to be the victim of an anti-Semitic conspiracy on Palm Beach.) Chief Reiter wrote an open letter to Krischer asking the Democrat to remove himself from the case. Then he turned to the Bush administration to seek justice against a Democratic donor/accused child rapist.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DixonHur

DixonHur 11170

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, longhornmatt said:

I don’t think you are joking (completely at least), but to piggyback your comment I suspect this actually would work with a huge amount of his supporters.  They flirt with it whenever one on their side gets busted with teens.  “Yeah, the law says so, but is she REALLY a child at that age?  In a different time she would be married and having children.  I mean, the law is the law, and I’m not saying it’s right what he did, but it’s not really a pedophile thing is all I’m saying ...”

If it’s Trump this time, a whole lot of them would go all the way and just say it’s ok.

God wouldn't have made them able to have children if they weren't old enough for sex.

/Evangelical Trump Supporter

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jack

Jack 51

Posted
Posted

 

2 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Oh I see the difference.  I’d like to see some evidence that Trump would see the difference.  

I think you are showing a bit of bias here.  I can laugh at most of the absurd exaggerations/caricatures but you are jumping the shark on this one.

We know that he knew the difference because he called attention to Epstein liking young girls in the New Yorker magazine interview back in 2002.   Most likely he implied there was something odd about it rather than explicitly stating it so he wouldn't be sued.   We also know that at some point, Epstein propositioned a girl at one of Trump's properties and it resulted in Epstein being banned for life.  I don't think he would have banned him if he was okay with that kind of thing.

The real story here seems to be that Epstein had blackmail (photos and video) on these guys he was flying to his island for sex parties with underage girls. I don't think it's a coincidence that the DOJ opens this up right after Mueller is done and this is most likely staged political revenge.  It's already public knowledge Bill Clinton was on those Lolita express flights.  That's probably who this is going after.

  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NotActuallyALonghorn

NotActuallyALonghorn 4968

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Bama Chick said:

How the hell do you get yourself THREE passports??
 

 

 

 

I believe some countries won't let you in if your passport has stamps from countries they don't like in it. So some folks who can show reason are allowed multiples. I've heard it isn't too uncommon with journalists. Probably not too uncommon with international businessmen. Also, one could be the card for driving across the border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pig Bellmont

Pig Bellmont 8691

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Jack said:

The real story here seems to be that Epstein had blackmail (photos and video) on these guys he was flying to his island for sex parties with underage girls. I don't think it's a coincidence that the DOJ opens this up right after Mueller is done and this is most likely staged political revenge.  It's already public knowledge Bill Clinton was on those Lolita express flights.  That's probably who this is going after.

You should probably stop reading Q anon reddit posts

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23356

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Jack said:

 

I think you are showing a bit of bias here.  I can laugh at most of the absurd exaggerations/caricatures but you are jumping the shark on this one.

We know that he knew the difference because he called attention to Epstein liking young girls in the New Yorker magazine interview back in 2002.   Most likely he implied there was something odd about it rather than explicitly stating it so he wouldn't be sued.   We also know that at some point, Epstein propositioned a girl at one of Trump's properties and it resulted in Epstein being banned for life.  I don't think he would have banned him if he was okay with that kind of thing.

The real story here seems to be that Epstein had blackmail (photos and video) on these guys he was flying to his island for sex parties with underage girls. I don't think it's a coincidence that the DOJ opens this up right after Mueller is done and this is most likely staged political revenge.  It's already public knowledge Bill Clinton was on those Lolita express flights.  That's probably who this is going after.

We’re talking about the same Donald Trump right?  The one that admits to sexual assault on tape and has around 20 credible allegations of sexual misconduct up to and including forcible rape? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27442

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Zavala said:

https://www.takimag.com/article/media-magic-how-a-democrat-pedophile-became-a-trump-scandal/

wew

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/takis-magazine/

Quote

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

 

Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Hate Group

Wew lad, if you're gonna lie to us, at least use a less blatantly false source. We aren't all as dumb as you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
triplehorn

triplehorn 2664

Posted
Posted

Pre-election from 11/4/2016:

Woman suing Trump over alleged teen rape drops suit, again

"A woman who accused Donald Trump of raping her two decades ago when she was a 13-year-old aspiring teen model has again dropped a federal lawsuit over the alleged assaults.

The accuser, identified in the lawsuit by the pseudonym "Jane Doe," was expected to appear at a news conference in Los Angeles Wednesday, but that appearance was abruptly canceled.

The lawyer who organized the event, Lisa Bloom, said Trump's accuser had received threats and was too frightened to show up.

In the most recent suit, Trump's accuser asserted that while she was exploring a modeling career in 1994, she attended a series of parties at the Manhattan home of prominent investor Jeffrey Epstein. She alleges that during those parties the real estate mogul tied her to a bed and raped her. She also claimed Epstein raped her during that series of gatherings

The accuser's lead attorney, Thomas Meagher of New Jersey, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. He filed a one-page notice dismissing the case Friday evening in federal court in Manhattan. No explanation was given for the action.

The accuser's lead attorney, Thomas Meagher of New Jersey, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. He filed a one-page notice dismissing the case Friday evening in federal court in Manhattan. No explanation was given for the action.

Bloom did not immediately respond to requests for comment Friday.

Through his attorney, Trump had flatly denied the woman's allegations.

"It is categorically untrue. It is completely frivolous. It is baseless. It is irresponsible," Trump attorney Alan Garten told POLITICO in September. "I won’t even discuss the merits because it gives it credibility that it doesn’t deserve."

Doe named Trump and Epstein as defendants in the suits and says they knew she was well under 17 — the age of consent. "I understood that both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein knew that I was 13 years old," she wrote.

Two earlier suits were filed over the same alleged events.

cont. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12799

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jhawk said:

You were always about "getting" trump.  If he was got then why hasn't he been impeached so they can throw him in rikers?  I'm guessing it is because the people who actually have some sort of legal background advised that going after him for anything in the Mueller report wouldn't stick.  If it is so black and white then he would at least be impeached.  Just like trump's birther movement, if it was true then everyone in congress (controlled by the repubs for a bit) would have latched on and impeached him. Instead, you have very few calls for impeachment from the sane left.  Only the radical left and people who need to "impeach trump!" for reelection call for his impeachment.  Why is that?  I thought they caught him red handed breaking the law?

It wouldn’t stick because one party has decided the president is above the law. Try to be a bit more creative at least in your shitty arguments. That’s for another thread though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29775

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Jack said:

 

I think you are showing a bit of bias here.  I can laugh at most of the absurd exaggerations/caricatures but you are jumping the shark on this one.

We know that he knew the difference because he called attention to Epstein liking young girls in the New Yorker magazine interview back in 2002.   Most likely he implied there was something odd about it rather than explicitly stating it so he wouldn't be sued.  

Most likely? The quote below is what you're talking about. Trump is talking about what they have in common and why Epstein is "a lot of fun to with."

Quote
  • A Trump biographer, Tim O'Brien, tweeted the quote from a 2002 profile of Epstein in New York magazine, in which Trump said: "I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."

You could have easily looked this up instead of remaining willfully ignorant in order to spin through speculation. 

What do you personally get out distorting the facts to protect a possible child rapist? If you're an American, how do you stomach that? 

It all makes sense if you're on a payroll. If you're not, fuck you.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45546

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jhawk said:

You were always about "getting" trump.  If he was got then why hasn't he been impeached so they can throw him in rikers?  

Two questions:

1.  are you functionally retarded?  Do you actually have no idea why Trump hasn't yet been impeached?

2.  (piggybacking on the first question) are you functionally retarded?  Are you under the impression that a conviction in an impeachment trial leads to prison time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Irieguy

Irieguy 1059

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, RDCanecutter said:

There is no way, in 2019, on an island allegedly stocked with teen-aged girls, that every square inch wasn't at some point thoroughly, compulsively photographed, then uploaded covered in filters of hearts, ponies, various solidarity flags, and puppy faces.

Trafficked women don’t get cell phones. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hank Scorpio

Hank Scorpio 17721

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Zavala said:

https://www.takimag.com/article/media-magic-how-a-democrat-pedophile-became-a-trump-scandal/

wew

 

One of my favorite things is when Republicans come and post articles from the most batshit insane websites as evidence to support their views. And the best ones always pretend that they are some high minded non partisan online journal that publishes articles entitled "What the #MeToo Movement Has in Common with Weimar Germany" or "What a Black Person Yelling at me on Twitter Means for the Future of Democracy". How do you fucking lunatics even find these websites? 

  • Like 7
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AUinHsv

AUinHsv 576

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, NotActuallyALonghorn said:

I believe some countries won't let you in if your passport has stamps from countries they don't like in it. So some folks who can show reason are allowed multiples. I've heard it isn't too uncommon with journalists. Probably not too uncommon with international businessmen. Also, one could be the card for driving across the border.

This is correct.  I knew some people who have separate passports for different Middle East coountries for this reason.  And no idea how easy it is now to get a faked passport but I suspect if you have a lot of money it is not difficult

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13132

Posted
Posted

Republican posters, 2019: "Oh man, when I was on TexAgs I found this awesome article written by JewStomper1488 on my favorite website, skulltruth.net. I'm going to go out into the normal world and talk to people outside of this insanely racist and xenophobic bubble and they're going to be so impressed."

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
deech

deech 2251

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

 

1 hour ago, Jack said:

 

I think you are showing a bit of bias here.  I can laugh at most of the absurd exaggerations/caricatures but you are jumping the shark on this one.

We know that he knew the difference because he called attention to Epstein liking young girls in the New Yorker magazine interview back in 2002.   Most likely he implied there was something odd about it rather than explicitly stating it so he wouldn't be sued.   We also know that at some point, Epstein propositioned a girl at one of Trump's properties and it resulted in Epstein being banned for life.  I don't think he would have banned him if he was okay with that kind of thing.

The real story here seems to be that Epstein had blackmail (photos and video) on these guys he was flying to his island for sex parties with underage girls. I don't think it's a coincidence that the DOJ opens this up right after Mueller is done and this is most likely staged political revenge.  It's already public knowledge Bill Clinton was on those Lolita express flights.  That's probably who this is going after.

No one gives a shit who this is going after.  Follow the evidence.  If it puts Clinton behind bars.  Cool.  if it puts Trump behind bars.  Cool.  It it puts both.  Cool.  If it puts none.  Cool.  Even in cases of child rape and human trafficking of minors we can't stray for a second away from political bullshit.  It's why our country's fucked if we don't right the ship.

Young girls, under 17 being passed around for sex and then using evidence as blackmail against high ranking politicians or government officials.  I give zero fucks whether it is a D or an R.  May they all burn.  All of them. 

  • Like 22
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DixonHur

DixonHur 11170

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

The number of Bill Clinton apologists on this forum is 0.

Trump supporters seem to think everyone who doesn't worship the orange God plasters their room with Bill Clinton posters.

We are no like you fuckers.  Sorry to disappoint.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...