The Supremes

[DigglerontheHoof 21206]

2 hours ago, Poe It Up said:

Yeah, that was not a serious post. Take it easy my man. 

You're such a clown-show, it's tough to tell. 

[Poe It Up 126]

2 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

You're such a clown-show, it's tough to tell. 

Yeah, well the jerk store called. They’re running out of you. 

[Poe It Up 126]

1 hour ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

psst: 

 

“Teacher, teacher, you forgot to give us our homework.”

[Longhorn_Fan68 33881]

4 minutes ago, Poe It Up said:

“Teacher, teacher, you forgot to give us our homework.”

More like, "Miss, Poe called me a fag again!" Maybe don't be a shitbird and no one will fuck with you.

[Poe It Up 126]

1 minute ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

More like, "Miss, Poe called me a fag again!" Maybe don't be a shitbird and no one will fuck with you.

Sure thing, hall monitor. 

[jimmyjazz 46000]

Some color on the "felony miscarriage" angle:  the US averages 15,000 homicides every year.  The US averages over 500,000 miscarriages every year.  There is absolutely no way -- LONG TERM -- this kind of draconian law will hold up. 

Is it reprehensible that a cadre of shitbags are trying to make it happen?  Yes, it's beyond reprehensible.  It still won't last.

An abortion ban in many (if not most) states will last.  Welcome to Gilead.

[Longhorn_Fan68 33881]

8 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

An abortion ban in many (if not most) states will last.  Welcome to Gilead.

maybe in the short term, but not over time. 

[DDD Dad 14346]

2 hours ago, fattyflattie said:

Disagree.  This board is littered with non-funny jokes. 

You might want sit this out.

[DDD Dad 14346]

1 hour ago, Poe It Up said:

Sure thing, hall monitor. 

Or, you know, you could just apologize for being an asshole.

[lemonlime 5503]

5 hours ago, Poe It Up said:

Yeah, that was not a serious post. Take it easy my man. 

Maybe you could explain what was humorous about your post.  

[safe sex 11738]

Well, you see, trans and non-binary people having the temerity exist is hilarious. Or something

[fattyflattie 4639]

1 hour ago, DDD Dad said:

You might want sit this out.

Why? I didn’t make the “joke”. 
 

I knew about the policy when it was enacted. It’s needed for like 2 posters.  I found the crying in this instance funny and sad. I’m sure he’ll get reported and take his vacation and you’ll have one less poster to challenge your ideas for a few days. Big win. 
 

eta: also lol @Felix  9 negs but not any time to reply. Sorry for whatever I did to your girl, bud. 

Edited May 12, 2022 by fattyflattie

[DDD Dad 14346]

1 minute ago, fattyflattie said:

Why? I didn’t make the “joke”. 
 

I knew about the policy when it was enacted. It’s needed for like 2 posters.  I found the crying in this instance funny and sad. I’m sure he’ll get reported and take his vacation and you’ll have one less poster to challenge your ideas for a few days. Big win. 

 

[fattyflattie 4639]

1 minute ago, DDD Dad said:

 

Touché 

[workswithseed 2108]

1 hour ago, fattyflattie said:

Touché 

More like touchy, am I right?

[Satchel 6938]

8 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

Hope is for suckers.

Remember the rules of this timeline: 1) it always gets worse, and 2) there is no bottom.

Lindsay says hi. 

[Sawbonz 27580]

4 hours ago, fattyflattie said:

Why? I didn’t make the “joke”. 
 

I knew about the policy when it was enacted. It’s needed for like 2 posters.  I found the crying in this instance funny and sad. I’m sure he’ll get reported and take his vacation and you’ll have one less poster to challenge your ideas for a few days. Big win. 
 

eta: also lol @Felix  9 negs but not any time to reply. Sorry for whatever I did to your girl, bud. 

 

 

this is why it’s nothing to joke about

Edited May 13, 2022 by Sawbonz

[wildcat09 29359]

 

[tx 3 putt 77230]

If it was up to alito, Barrett, and Thomas, gays would be rounded up and sent away. 

[Mrs Whiggins 13050]

11 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

If it was up to alito, Barrett, and Thomas, gays would be rounded up and sent away. 

Alan Turing's ghost should pay them a visit.

[Sawbonz 27580]

33 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

If it was up to alito, Barrett, and Thomas, gays would be rounded up and sent away. 

And himself 

[Brian Fantana 6689]

My next wife better love abortion as much as I do, I want to have at least 2 a year!!

[Brisketexan 105177]

50 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

 

Okay, neat little intellectual exercise here.  Let's apply Alito's reasoning -- "the concept of X was unknown at the time" of certain legislative or constitutional action, and therefore, applying the legislation or constitution to that concept is "indefensible."

"All men are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights"

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

At the time of each of these documents -- 1776 and 1789 -- "men" only included white males....same with "People," in terms of those who could actually vote and take the action spoken of (ordain and establish).  Therefore, any application of the Constitution or the principles of the Declaration of Independence to anyone but white males is, by Alito's reasoning, "indefensible."

OR, an alternative approach....we have progressed and realized that women and non-white males are "men" and "people" too, and have all of the relevant rights.

Naah, let's go with Alito's intellectually fallacious "modality of Constitutional interpretation," which would literally freeze society in the era of powdered wigs and rampant dysentery. 

[hornmpa96 2619]

Alito can go fuck himself. 

[tx 3 putt 77230]

Who’s going to be the first to publicly question slaves being freed ?

[jimmyjazz 46000]

2 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

Who’s going to be the first to publicly question slaves being freed ?

I'll go with Louie Gohmert.

[tx 3 putt 77230]

6 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I'll go with Louie Gohmert.

Taking away the black vote would be a huge help to R’s in the south. Paxton would support this 

[Chad Fuck 17698]

2 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

Taking away the black vote would be a huge help to R’s in the south. Paxton would support this 

With Abbott close behind..."Hey, it's what the people want!"

 

[Gap03 3308]

Is this for real?

Why do Dems insist on bickering among themselves and imposing never-ending purity tests?  I fully expect this to devolve into another "Defund the Police"  debacle that will allow the GQP to bludgeon the reproductive rights movement into oblivion.  

[tx 3 putt 77230]

6 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:

With Abbott close behind..."Hey, it's what the people want!"

 

they wouldn’t take away 100% of the black vote, every R has one black friend that should be able to vote !

[Chad Fuck 17698]

1 minute ago, tx 3 putt said:

they wouldn’t take away 100% of the black vote, every R has one black friend that should be able to vote !

Dibs on Allen West!  

[Brian Fantana 6689]

If anyone ever needed to be assassinated (hypothetically, in a video game), it's Alito

[Dutchrudder 11147]

4 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

they wouldn’t take away 100% of the black vote, every R has one black friend that should be able to vote !

The vast majority of "conservatives" black friend is Candace Owens because they follow her on Facebook.

[tx 3 putt 77230]

28 minutes ago, Dutchrudder said:

The vast majority of "conservatives" black friend is Candace Owens because they follow her on Facebook.

1. the random black kid that went to their elementary for one year

2. the black kid on their hs sports team 

3. the black clubhouse attendant at their country club

4. the black waiter at their favorite restaurant 

Edited May 13, 2022 by tx 3 putt

[NameAlreadyInUse 5114]

1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:

 

So how did he come down on the 2nd Amendment, where the types of weapons that are available today were not yet conceived of back in those days?  WHy are they legal by default?  And why is he ok with ignoring the words "well regulated" in that amendment but needs to parse every other word in the document? 

Could it be that he's proof texting, just bending the words to mean what he wants them to mean and ignoring the rest, kind of like most Christian Americans do the Bible?  Nah, that couldn't be it.

[Captainant 27689]

43 minutes ago, Gap03 said:

Is this for real?

Why do Dems insist on bickering among themselves and imposing never-ending purity tests?  I fully expect this to devolve into another "Defund the Police"  debacle that will allow the GQP to bludgeon the reproductive rights movement into oblivion.  

Because they have the same fucking leadership they've had for the last three decades. Someone needs to get chuck and nancy to fuck the fuck off

[Brisketexan 105177]

8 minutes ago, NameAlreadyInUse said:

So how did he come down on the 2nd Amendment, where the types of weapons that are available today were not yet conceived of back in those days?  WHy are they legal by default?  And why is he ok with ignoring the words "well regulated" in that amendment but needs to parse every other word in the document? 

Could it be that he's proof texting, just bending the words to mean what he wants them to mean and ignoring the rest, kind of like most Christian Americans do the Bible?  Nah, that couldn't be it.

It couldn't be more spot on.

The concept of firearms with a rapid rate of fire was "unknown at the time" of the passage of the 2nd Amendment, and had the founding fathers had known the 2nd Amendment would be interpreted in a way that allowed functionally every person (note -- all persons, not just white males) to own a personal firearm that constitutes greater firepower than an entire company of soldiers in the late 1700s, "it might not have gotten a single vote."

The reasoning is super-easy to apply, logically.  But Alito does not and will not.  He does it only selectively, as a proof-texter.  Because Alito is a piece of dick.  He's Scalia without the intellect, humanity, or decency (and yes, that evaluation is every bit as scathing as it sounds).

Edited May 13, 2022 by Brisketexan

[WhatTheBuck 28794]

1 hour ago, hornmpa96 said:

Alito can go fuck himself. 

So can George W. Bush who appointed him.

[WhatTheBuck 28794]

1 hour ago, tx 3 putt said:

Who’s going to be the first to publicly question slaves being freed ?

Clarence Thomas. 

[wildcat09 29359]

If we can't deviate from the drafter's intent, any analysis of any 14th amendment equal protection claim regarding race should involve breaking out some calipers and checking people's blood to really determine their race. Because they had weird fucking ideas about race in the 1800s that we know are stupid now. But you'll never see Alito go that far, because it'd be so obviously stupid. His entire concept of the law is just that when he was a kid his mom stayed at home and he got to beat up gay kids on the playground, and that's how shit should still work. There's nothing more to it than that.

[Johnny Sack 8397]

3 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

It couldn't be more spot on.

The concept of firearms with a rapid rate of fire was "unknown at the time" of the passage of the 2nd Amendment, and had the founding fathers had known the 2nd Amendment would be interpreted in a way that allowed functionally every person (note -- all persons, not just white males) to own a personal firearm that constitutes greater firepower than an entire company of soldiers in the late 1700s, "it might not have gotten a single vote."

The reasoning is super-easy to apply, logically.  But Alito does not and will not.  He does it only selectively, as a proof-texter.  Because Alito is a piece of dick.  He's Scalia without the intellect, humanity, or decency (and yes, that evaluation is every bit as scathing as it sounds).

https://thethermidor.com/the-puckle-gun/

Patented in 1718, 73 years prior to the ratification of the 2nd Amendment.

Then you have the Kalthoff Repeater:

Designed in 1630, the Kalthoff Repeater was a flintlock rifle that could fire between 30-60 rounds per minute. It went through multiple variations, some able to fire 29 shots without reloading, similar to the standard magazine capacities of the Colt AR-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalthoff_repeater

Or the Cookson Repeater

The Cookson Repeater was a repeating rifle designed in the late 17^th century. It used a rotating drum magazine and had a fourteen shot capacity. The gun could fire all fourteen shots without reloading, a feat which was only surpassed by the Kalthoff Repeater.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cookson_repeater

[Satchel 6938]

3 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Clarence Thomas. 

He’s exactly what Hakeem Jeffries says he is - a [biscuit baking] hater.

[kevwun 15811]

I remember George Washington crossing the Delware while under fire from British Puckle guns.  Only a handful were ever made and I doubt any of the founders ever heard of it.

Edited May 13, 2022 by kevwun

[royiv 9332]

2 minutes ago, kevwun said:

I remember George Washington crossing the Delware while under fire from British Puckle guns.

Don’t forget about all of the school shootings with the Kalthoff repeater.

[WhatTheBuck 28794]

6 minutes ago, Satchel said:

He’s exactly what Hakeem Jeffries says he is - a [biscuit baking] hater.

He’s such an Uncle Tom his name is actually Thomas. 

[Johnny Sack 8397]

Repeaters existed when the second was ratified.  So Brisket was wrong.  Jesus you sumbitches will team play and goal tend as much as any Trumper.

[Brisketexan 105177]

32 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

https://thethermidor.com/the-puckle-gun/

Patented in 1718, 73 years prior to the ratification of the 2nd Amendment.

Then you have the Kalthoff Repeater:

Designed in 1630, the Kalthoff Repeater was a flintlock rifle that could fire between 30-60 rounds per minute. It went through multiple variations, some able to fire 29 shots without reloading, similar to the standard magazine capacities of the Colt AR-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalthoff_repeater

Or the Cookson Repeater

The Cookson Repeater was a repeating rifle designed in the late 17^th century. It used a rotating drum magazine and had a fourteen shot capacity. The gun could fire all fourteen shots without reloading, a feat which was only surpassed by the Kalthoff Repeater.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cookson_repeater

Fair enough; repeating firearms did technically exist.  That said, they were quite rare, quite unreliable, and super-expensive.  So, since we're talking about broad-based civilian ownership of firearms, how about we add the adjectives "reliable, functional, and affordable by the average citizen" to my description, and we're right back where we started - that concept didn't exist.  And of course, we've never gotten past the foundational problems that "men" and "people" functionally didn't include anyone but white males in the late 1700s, so we're back to the problem of the Founding Fathers not conceiving of anyone other than a white male being able to carry a firearm.

Alito-style "originalism" remains indefensible claptrap.

[hayden_horn 11364]

On 5/12/2022 at 8:32 AM, Johnny Sack said:

Especially from the bitter childless single women on this thread.  They have mainstream views and really have their finger on the pulse of what parents think.

enjoy your holiday for this post. it's the sum of your attacks on her,  not necessarily this individual one, but it's so over the top misogynistic i had no choice. 

jesus man get ahold of yourself. 

[Foosters 17858]

4 hours ago, Captainant said:

Because they have the same fucking leadership they've had for the last three decades. Someone needs to get chuck and nancy to fuck the fuck off

Went to a comedy show last night where the comedian suggested that maybe Feinstein could go on a hunger strike for abortion rights. Due to her dementia, she wouldn't even know she's on a hunger strike. Win win!

[WhatTheBuck 28794]

15 minutes ago, Foosters said:

Went to a comedy show last night where the comedian suggested that maybe Feinstein could go on a hunger strike for abortion rights. Due to her dementia, she wouldn't even know she's on a hunger strike. Win win!

Sounds hilarious.