The Supremes

[David Dennison 19120]

You know what didn't exist?

Corporations as people.

[Foosters 17919]

1 minute ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Sounds hilarious.

you had to be there

[mchookem 16519]

23 minutes ago, Foosters said:

Went to a comedy show last night where the comedian suggested that maybe Feinstein could go on a hunger strike for abortion rights. Due to her dementia, she wouldn't even know she's on a hunger strike. Win win!

 

[mchookem 16519]

dp

Edited May 13, 2022 by mchookem

[NameAlreadyInUse 5138]

I don't get it.

[Lurch 5940]

Sounds hilarious.

Must have been in the delivery

[Foosters 17919]

 I was also really high so fuck all yall

[Horndog 2269]

5 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

https://thethermidor.com/the-puckle-gun/

Patented in 1718, 73 years prior to the ratification of the 2nd Amendment.

Then you have the Kalthoff Repeater:

Designed in 1630, the Kalthoff Repeater was a flintlock rifle that could fire between 30-60 rounds per minute. It went through multiple variations, some able to fire 29 shots without reloading, similar to the standard magazine capacities of the Colt AR-15.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalthoff_repeater

Or the Cookson Repeater

The Cookson Repeater was a repeating rifle designed in the late 17^th century. It used a rotating drum magazine and had a fourteen shot capacity. The gun could fire all fourteen shots without reloading, a feat which was only surpassed by the Kalthoff Repeater.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cookson_repeater

And Christine Jorgensen underwent sexual transition in the early 1950s. So what's your point? 

[Sawbonz 27779]

12 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

My next wife better love abortion as much as I do, I want to have at least 2 a year!!

Pretty long odds you knock her up both times y’all fuck

[Anastasis 23508]

16 hours ago, hayden_horn said:

enjoy your holiday for this post. it's the sum of your attacks on her,  not necessarily this individual one, but it's so over the top misogynistic i had no choice. 

jesus man get ahold of yourself. 

I am curious hayden, do you keep a running tally of the personal attacks levied by posters against each other on this sub?  Sack is a fucking asshole no doubt, but I would be curious as to what your ledger shows in terms of the sum of the personal attacks directed at him. People wonder why the exchanges have gotten so personal and adversarial in this sub. Well, as you put it, it is not the individual posts, its the sum of the personal attacks that you let slide for years, only chiming up in ways that come off as capricious. The moderation of this sub wrt personal attacks has been a total shit show for a long time and this is the end result. Congrats. 

 

Edited May 14, 2022 by Anastasis

[Bozo_Casanova 26683]

16 hours ago, Foosters said:

Went to a comedy show last night where the comedian suggested that maybe Feinstein could go on a hunger strike for abortion rights. Due to her dementia, she wouldn't even know she's on a hunger strike. Win win!

Were you in Branson?

[Anastasis 23508]

2 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Were you in Branson?

Now see, that is actually funny. 

[Bama Chick 28596]

Don’t cry to the rest of us about norms and decorum - you live with a crazy shithouse rat who participated in a coup, you evil sack of crap.

[South Austin 52688]

You don’t have clearance, Clarence.

[Brisketexan 105576]

Don’t cry to the rest of us about norms and decorum - you live with a crazy shithouse rat who participated in a coup, you evil sack of crap.

You know that did irreparable damage to our government institutions?
A violent insurrection that meant that we didn’t have a peaceful transfer of power for the first time since the Civil War. And his demonic cunt of a wife was one of the chief proponents and instigators of it. So he can fuck all the way off, then fuck off again, then triple that fucking off.

[Serak The Preparer 3436]

1 hour ago, Anastasis said:

I am curious hayden, do you keep a running tally of the personal attacks levied by posters against each other on this sub?  Sack is a fucking asshole no doubt, but I would be curious as to what your ledger shows in terms of the sum of the personal attacks directed at him. People wonder why the exchanges have gotten so personal and adversarial in this sub. Well, as you put it, it is not the individual posts, its the sum of the personal attacks that you let slide for years, only chiming up in ways that come off as capricious. The moderation of this sub wrt personal attacks has been a total shit show for a long time and this is the end result. Congrats. 

 

Have to agree. I certainly don't miss @Onboard 2.0 at all but his suspension that led to his tantrum was similarly capricious. Now there are certainly some that literally only come in to this forum to troll and avoid discussion (e.g. clapclap. caponeta) but for all his shitiness Sack will actually occasionally respond. I'm also not sure he gets more personal than others do to him.

[Goredho 17511]

On 5/9/2022 at 7:10 PM, Ag with kids said:

So you realize that it's very few of us and shit tons of you.

That’s the problem.  Nationwide, there are relatively few of you imposing a horrifying future on shit tons of the rest of us.  But enjoy the evangelical spring.  The season will turn to your autumn soon enough.

[RPM 26430]

53 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

Don’t cry to the rest of us about norms and decorum - you live with a crazy shithouse rat who participated in a coup, you evil sack of crap.
 

What gets me is they think the leak (the actual act) destroyed trust in the court. NOooooooooo. It was the hijacking of nominations in order to politicize the court that destroyed the trust. The leak was just sunlight on the wound.

[Bateshorn 9957]

19 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

Repeaters existed when the second was ratified.  So Brisket was wrong.  Jesus you sumbitches will team play and goal tend as much as any Trumper.

Even though you are on a break, The problem with your logic, which should be obvious, is you want the 2nd amendment to cover all the literally and rhetorics children and dependents  of this technology and philosophy, without extending it to any of the other amendments.

Thats a logical fallacy.  If you want to lock one amendment in place, you have to lock all of them. So this technology is legal, in it’s original form.  But if you are going to accept Alito’s arguments about original and deeply held beliefs and reject the “living Constitution “. And especially a originalist approach: The SAW  or AR-15 are not consistent with that view and is subject to full and thorough regulation. The court must, under Alito’s thinking, limit itself to only debates about technology and existent firearms at the time of ratification.

[TwiceHorn 31685]

On 5/13/2022 at 8:24 AM, wildcat09 said:

 

What's kind of comical about this is that Scalia, among others, would have said that legislative intent is irrelevant.  We assume Congress meant what they said.

This is kind of bizarre:  it's an unambiguous statute (ambiguity is typically required before you look behind the words to things like intent), so lets look behind the words and figure that Congress couldn't possibly have meant what it said.

[Bateshorn 9957]

13 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

What's kind of comical about this is that Scalia, among others, would have said that legislative intent is irrelevant.  We assume Congress meant what they said.

This is kind of bizarre:  it's an unambiguous statute (ambiguity is typically required before you look behind the words to things like intent), so lets look behind the words and figure that Congress couldn't possibly have meant what it said.

Well, it’s what obviously flawed in his logic about Abortion (if not Roe): there is zero mention of the unborn in the constitution. None. The first mention is in the citizenship clause in the 14th. Thus the unborn have no rights under a textual reading of the constitution. Or really an originalist, since the unborn are never discussed in the Federalist papers.  But women do have due process rights.  Thus even if you adopt a reading of the constitution that somehow gives legislatures the right to protect the unborn, it must follow the due process rights of women, which would give them the right to learn, understand, and resolve a pregnancy in advance of any state action.  I can see a reading of Dobbs that bans abortion after 15 weeks, but not before, because to do so denies a woman reasonable due process. A total ban has always, to my mind, been unconstitutional since the 14th amendment was passed.  
 

And this says nothing of unenumerated rights.  

Edited May 14, 2022 by Bateshorn

[Poe It Up 126]

3 hours ago, Anastasis said:

I am curious hayden, do you keep a running tally of the personal attacks levied by posters against each other on this sub?  Sack is a fucking asshole no doubt, but I would be curious as to what your ledger shows in terms of the sum of the personal attacks directed at him. People wonder why the exchanges have gotten so personal and adversarial in this sub. Well, as you put it, it is not the individual posts, its the sum of the personal attacks that you let slide for years, only chiming up in ways that come off as capricious. The moderation of this sub wrt personal attacks has been a total shit show for a long time and this is the end result. Congrats. 

 

I actually feel sorry for the mods. Poor guys just liked Texas football and now they’re stuck reading Captain’s complaints all day. 

[Anastasis 23508]

5 minutes ago, Poe It Up said:

I actually feel sorry for the mods. Poor guys just liked Texas football and now they’re stuck reading Captain’s complaints all day. 

Yeah, I agree.  Hayden is a really good guy, at least based on my IRL interactions with him.  Though a number of years ago at this point, I have no reason to think any different. 

 

 

 

[fattyflattie 4639]

2 hours ago, Serak The Preparer said:

I'm also not sure he gets more personal than others do to him.

There’s a poster that literally toes all the way to the line of doxxing him. So yeah, I’d say he likely doesn’t get as personal.  

[royiv 9452]

15 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:

There’s a poster that literally toes all the way to the line of doxxing him. So yeah, I’d say he likely doesn’t get as personal.  

Sack does plenty to dox himself. He doesn't need other posters to do it for him. 

[Bateshorn 9957]

38 minutes ago, royiv said:

Sack does plenty to dox himself. He doesn't need other posters to do it for him. 

Didn’t he out  himself on TOS?

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19243]

5 hours ago, Anastasis said:

I am curious hayden, do you keep a running tally of the personal attacks levied by posters against each other on this sub?  Sack is a fucking asshole no doubt, but I would be curious as to what your ledger shows in terms of the sum of the personal attacks directed at him. People wonder why the exchanges have gotten so personal and adversarial in this sub. Well, as you put it, it is not the individual posts, its the sum of the personal attacks that you let slide for years, only chiming up in ways that come off as capricious. The moderation of this sub wrt personal attacks has been a total shit show for a long time and this is the end result. Congrats. 

 

It's personal because you, Sack, and a number of other MALE posters, who will never, ever be put in a similar position, want to take away MY ability, and every other woman's ability, to make decisions about our bodies and our reproduction.  So yeah, it's personal. It also doesn't help that Sack lays into the misogyny pretty hard when it's me, Trauma, or Bama that stand up to him.  

Edited May 14, 2022 by PenelopeWitherspoon

[jimmyjazz 46476]

29 minutes ago, Bateshorn said:

Didn’t he out  himself on TOS?

I don't think he outed himself specifically, but he did reveal his family connections.

[mchookem 16519]

as i've said before...

the 'men' here that go for the low-hanging misogynistic insults of female posters do so for very specific, very obvious reasons. they are just very, very small, in every sense of the word.

also, posrep for this line alone lol

7 hours ago, Anastasis said:

Sack is a fucking asshole no doubt...

 

[bolverk 29820]

3 hours ago, fattyflattie said:

There’s a poster that literally toes all the way to the line of doxxing him. So yeah, I’d say he likely doesn’t get as personal.  

Johnny literally has gone all the way to the line of doxxing himself. I revealed nothing he hadn't already revealed about himself except for mentioning that he has a goofy face. That comment was in the context of him getting awful personal with cruel comments about Penelope's looks after she posted a photo of herself with Covid.

[Bateshorn 9957]

4 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Johnny literally has gone all the way to the line of doxxing himself. I revealed nothing he hadn't already revealed about himself except for mentioning that he has a goofy face. That comment was in the context of him getting awful personal with cruel comments about Penelope's looks after she posted a photo of herself with Covid.

Also, you gave us MC Danger girl, so you get a fuck ton of leeway. 

[bolverk 29820]

2 minutes ago, Bateshorn said:

Also, you gave us MC Danger girl, so you get a fuck ton of leeway. 

Funny you mention her. His response to my saying he had a goofy face was to call her ugly. Dude is absolutely a misogynist.

[fattyflattie 4639]

4 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Johnny literally has gone all the way to the line of doxxing himself. I revealed nothing he hadn't already revealed about himself except for mentioning that he has a goofy face. That comment was in the context of him getting awful personal with cruel comments about Penelope's looks after she posted a photo of herself with Covid.

There's dozens of people who could pretty easily be doxxed here.  Lobo, who left recently because it was getting too close, is but one example.  It's not hard to figure out who his grandfather was.  He's told us 100 times his role in the church, and never once mentioned it.  Others did. 

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19243]

26 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Johnny literally has gone all the way to the line of doxxing himself. I revealed nothing he hadn't already revealed about himself except for mentioning that he has a goofy face. That comment was in the context of him getting awful personal with cruel comments about Penelope's looks after she posted a photo of herself with Covid.

Yeah, he called me Katy.  1.  I'm not Katy.  2.  I look nothing like Katy.  Hell, I look younger now than Katy did 10 years ago.  3. Sack hates women.  It is very obvious in the way he attacks us.

Just to be clear, a lot of women have chosen not to get married of have children. It's not because we are bitter, or as Sack believes, lonely and unloved since we can't keep a man.  

Edited May 14, 2022 by PenelopeWitherspoon

[bolverk 29820]

Just now, fattyflattie said:

There's dozens of people who could pretty easily be doxxed here.  Lobo, who left recently because it was getting too close, is but one example.  It's not hard to figure out who his grandfather was.  He's told us 100 times his role in the church, and never once mentioned it.  Others did. 

He mentioned it on the other site. As soon as he protested it being named, I immediately deleted.

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19243]

18 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Johnny literally has gone all the way to the line of doxxing himself. I revealed nothing he hadn't already revealed about himself except for mentioning that he has a goofy face. That comment was in the context of him getting awful personal with cruel comments about Penelope's looks after she posted a photo of herself with Covid.

To be fair, I thought I looked pretty good for having COVID and having had 2 bottles of wine that night.  🤣

[fattyflattie 4639]

4 minutes ago, bolverk said:

He mentioned it on the other site. As soon as he protested it being named, I immediately deleted.

I didn’t know it was you. Just remember the rumblings of it. 

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19243]

To be fair, he isn't here to defend himself.  So, let's get back to talking about The Supremes. 

 

Just want to add a hearty FUCK YOU to Clarence Thomas for his whining in Dallas.  People on the train looked at me when I scoffed VERY LOUDLY.

[bolverk 29820]

1 minute ago, fattyflattie said:

I didn’t know it was you. Just remember the rumblings of it. 

That's fine. I won't say anything more at the risk of being accused of doxxing him again. In fact, I've put him on ignore so hopefully will never have to interact with him again.

[Bateshorn 9957]

24 minutes ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

To be fair, he isn't here to defend himself.  So, let's get back to talking about The Supremes. 

 

Just want to add a hearty FUCK YOU to Clarence Thomas for his whining in Dallas.  People on the train looked at me when I scoffed VERY LOUDLY.

The richness of him bitching about people protesting at Judges houses when his wife literally took part in a failed coup attempt would give the beetus.

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19243]

19 minutes ago, Bateshorn said:

The richness of him bitching about people protesting at Judges houses when his wife literally took part in a failed coup attempt would give the beetus.

Exactly.

[WhatTheBuck 28835]

7 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

You know that did irreparable damage to our government institutions?
A violent insurrection that meant that we didn’t have a peaceful transfer of power for the first time since the Civil War. And his demonic cunt of a wife was one of the chief proponents and instigators of it. So he can fuck all the way off, then fuck off again, then triple that fucking off.

And he knew his evil cunt of a wife was part of it and cast a lone dissenting vote to try to protect her. He would’ve been perfectly fine if the coup had been successful.

He’s not fit for his seat on the bench and everything Anita Hill said was true. 

[David Dennison 19120]

So this is a "what Johnny Sack did to get put in time out" thread now?

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19243]

 

 

[fattyflattie 4639]

9 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

So this is a "what Johnny Sack did to get put in time out" thread now?

Well the supremes haven’t shit down their leg in 48 hours or so. 

[WhatTheBuck 28835]

Champion dude represent!

[Cacti 191]

2 hours ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

...I scoffed VERY LOUDLY.

Okay, that’s funny. Did you mean it to be funny?

[Pig Bellmont 8753]

11 hours ago, Bama Chick said:

 

Edited May 15, 2022 by Pig Bellmont

[Captainant 27972]

19 hours ago, Poe It Up said:

I actually feel sorry for the mods. Poor guys just liked Texas football and now they’re stuck reading Captain’s complaints all day. 

Lmao well it's always nice to be thought of, but I don't really report people in CR unless it's outright racism or someone going on a legit bender. I also haven't reported you or sack, but don't let me get in the way of your victim complex

[Bookman 4726]

Things got a little out of hand. It's just -- its just this war and that lying son-of-a-bitch Johnson!