Jump to content

The Supremes

tx 3 putt

By tx 3 putt
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45677

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Serak The Preparer said:

Yes. I don't know the mechanics or if it's possible but something like a 2 year renewable lease for $1 would at least start to make sense but just giving would be dumb.

Well, and when the Rs come back to power they could just shut them down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 12.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Brisketexan
Brisketexan

Some people and posts above see this for the incredibly dangerous thing it is.  See the whole forest, not just the tree.  Roe is built on the bedrock of the 14th amendment and the inherent right to pr

Ghost of LL
Ghost of LL

The whole episode is pretty bad for the Court.  The leak is embarrassing.  But the decision is catastrophic. You've got a 5-4 decision to get rid of a something that has been settled as a constit

sidis
sidis

in one of the many instances in which i debunked your oversimplified, unsupported bullshit and you simply never responded, i addressed your absolutist contention that religious are more charitable tha

Posted Images

Macklemore

Macklemore 2876

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Willfully Horn said:

All pro new-right posts deserve fuck you, you un-American, anti-democratic paskudnik, reactions. The new—right straight up seeks absolute power vested in a monarch. 

“The (new) right knows that all government is absolute. Because of this, the (new) right is only interested in paths to absolute power.”

-Curtis Yarvin

 

 

 

 

 

 

This guy gets it. Monarchy is sexy.

Edited by Macklemore
  • Fuck You 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chad Fuck

Chad Fuck 17672

Posted
Posted
Of course it will only be temporary. Which is why eliminating the right to privacy is insane, because whoever is in power will just flip the switch back and forth. 

Until the SC says that states rights don’t matter anymore with regard to abortion, because they say so.

This is the new law: There is no law but what the GOP scotus says it is.
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28777

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Goofyboy said:

Since privacy is gone… how fast could Biden and co require a national gun registration?? They should also go ahead and mandate ALL vaccines for any pandemic type diseases (polio, small pox, etc). If we are going authoritarian, fuck it, let’s go. Rip the bandaid off and get rolling. This death by a 1000 cuts is tiring.

The problem is that the super majority on the Supreme Court are a bunch of political hacks and total hypocrites. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45677

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Chad Fuck said:


This. Make no mistake, the Federal outlaw of abortion in all states will come just as soon as the gop controls the WH and Congress.

Yet another reason to kill the filibuster and get the jump on them.  But Democrats.  lulz.  cry.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23469

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 6/25/2022 at 8:10 AM, Smax said:

The right needs to drop this "life is special, life is precious" bullshit because its not. There are over 8 billion people on this rock, thousands are born every day and thousands die every day. Life isn't special, its a dime a dozen

Not surprised to see this take, it has been put out here before. Kinda surprised to see little push back with few exceptions, and some pos reps.

The intrinsic value of human life is not a sample size or kinetics equation. 

I hope that some of you will take a breath at some point and see where this type of logic goes.  

Edited by Anastasis
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grade of D as in David

Grade of D as in David 13253

Posted
Posted
On 6/25/2022 at 11:02 AM, bolverk said:

I got put on timeout for a week twice, each time, for going after the fucker.

Once, because I stated the name of his church, which he absolutely mentioned on the other site (otherwise, how would I have ever known? I don't live in Houston and have never met him. I wasn't even completely sure I got the name right, but he confirmed it in his response). The second time was for quoting a couple of snippets from that same church's "we believe page" (without mentioning the name of the church) to point out how Johnny's hypocrisy runs contrary to what his place of worship supposedly espouses. Others have posted various accounts of how active his role is in that church.

In both cases, they were in direct response to him making very personal and direct attacks on two separate posters. In the first case, he was being an absolutely toxic misogynist, making fun of the appearance of a female poster suffering through Covid. In the other case, he led a riled up cabal (yes, I said it) of angry, spiteful sewage spewers who were shitting all over one of our LGBTQ+ sisters. So far as I know, she, an excellent poster btw, has only made one appearance on this site since.

The point I'm making is that he likely reported me in both cases (and I took my lumps without complaint) while is somehow treated with kid gloves in spite of the poisonous bile he vomits all over other posters. His celebration last night of an assault on peaceful protesters and this morning's link to a known "fake news" website that spreads Putin's propaganda deserve something.

I'm guessing it was thin skinned blacklab who banned you both times.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45677

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Anastasis said:

Not surprised to see this take, it has been put out here before. Kinda surprised to see little push back with few exceptions, and some pos reps.

The intrinsic value of human life is not a sample size or kinetics equation. 

I hope that some of you will take a breath at some point and see where this type of logic goes.  

Don't you believe wolves have souls?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45903

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Not surprised to see this take, it has been put out here before. Kinda surprised to see little push back with few exceptions, and some pos reps.

The intrinsic value of human life is not a sample size or kinetics equation. 

I hope that some of you will take a breath at some point and see where this type of logic goes.  

Oh holy Christ, you're scolding us over a smax post?

Take a breath yourself.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105098

Posted
Posted
Not surprised to see this take, it has been put out here before. Kinda surprised to see little push back with few exceptions, and some pos reps.
The intrinsic value of human life is not a sample size or kinetics equation. 
I hope that some of you will take a breath at some point and see where this type of logic goes.  

Life indeed does have no value. Only power had value. The entire GQP out front, masturbating furiously to their Putin-esque dreams, shoulda told you.
We don’t make the rules around here. The GQP does. And they’ve made that rule loud and clear. Ignore it at your peril.
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grade of D as in David

Grade of D as in David 13253

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Neonmoon said:

It provides safe access to reproductive healthcare to all states 

and we get to watch stupid people learn the difference between states rights and federal rights. One dollar says some dumb fuck governor tries to shut down one of the clinics with state troops and Biden has to bring in troops (Little Rock Boogaloo)

Except unfortunately there's no way Biden and the Dems force the issue by doing this.

 

I'm with Liz on this one that it should be done ASAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChiTownDoc

ChiTownDoc 21152

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

You don't have to worry because you can write your own RX after.

True, but she put it out there she’s definitely down with women getting abortions, depending on the circumstances.  Tricking a gal into taking plan B is very Republican.  I’m a democrat now, brother.  Call me, Kristi.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18856

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Anastasis said:

Not surprised to see this take, it has been put out here before. Kinda surprised to see little push back with few exceptions, and some pos reps.

The intrinsic value of human life is not a sample size or kinetics equation. 

I hope that some of you will take a breath at some point and see where this type of logic goes.  

The intrinsic value of human life is a human creation. But you know that.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23469

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Dude, you got what you wanted.

Well that is not true.  I would much prefer that we were a society and culture that was working towards a common appreciation of the innate value of human life. Instead our politics charts a course where people are hardened into arguing that human life has no value, to reject the underpinnings of natural law and natural rights, and to do so both in seriousness and flippantly with free interchange. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45677

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Well that is not true.  I would much prefer that we were a society and culture that was working towards a common appreciation of the innate value of human life. Instead our politics charts a course where people are hardened into arguing that human life has no value, to reject the underpinnings of natural law and natural rights, and to do so both in seriousness and flippantly with free interchange. 

I don’t know why I’m continuing this, but I guess I’m feeling saucy tonight. I’m not arguing human life has NO value. I am arguing that people way overvalue their own value compared to everyone and everything else. It’s this selfishness that causes people to hurt others. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 3
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18856

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Well that is not true.  I would much prefer that we were a society and culture that was working towards a common appreciation of the innate value of human life. Instead our politics charts a course where people are hardened into arguing that human life has no value, to reject the underpinnings of natural law and natural rights, and to do so both in seriousness and flippantly with free interchange. 

Rights are a creation of man. Human life has value because man says it has value. Nature doesn't care about you.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27658

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Anastasis said:

I would much prefer that we were a society and culture that was working towards a common appreciation of the innate value of human life

Rich words from someone who keeps a roof over his head and food on his table by contributing to and profiting from the exploitative health "insurance" industry. You don't value the quality of a life, just that it will still produce premiums. 

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pig Bellmont

Pig Bellmont 8715

Posted
Posted

We’re not done yet. EPA likely about to be told it can’t regulate carbon emissions and the Biden admin will be told it must enforce a Trump era immigration policy. 
 

At least my daughters can carry concealed handguns for self defense in the MadMax hellscape they will inherit

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neonmoon

Neonmoon 38129

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

In for the first non-Christian prayer freakout from Evangelicals.

I would literally pay money to watch this. If there is a Principal/Teacher/Coach who is muslim. Please please please start doing prayers in red states. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Laxtonto

Laxtonto 12080

Posted
Posted
Just now, Pig Bellmont said:

Yes - West Virginia v. EPA. Here’s an explainer:

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/west-virginia-v-environmental-protection-agency/

Really curious about WV vs EPA from a purely logistical standpoint if they side with WV. If it gets overturned and therefore the bureaucracies cant enact various statutes without legislative oversight, how does that functionally work in practice? Is it going to be semiannual omnibus bills about regs or what?

I agree that the tendency to just let the bureaucracy to develop policy based upon the view of the those nominated by the current administration has made the federal regulations very reactive and shifting depending on who is in office,  but if you restrain the ability to then put it back upon the legislative branch you are now having a bunch of non-experts developing regs...

 

There needs to be a balance, just not sure how to fix it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...