Jump to content

The Supremes

tx 3 putt

By tx 3 putt
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Brisketexan
Brisketexan

Some people and posts above see this for the incredibly dangerous thing it is.  See the whole forest, not just the tree.  Roe is built on the bedrock of the 14th amendment and the inherent right to pr

Ghost of LL
Ghost of LL

The whole episode is pretty bad for the Court.  The leak is embarrassing.  But the decision is catastrophic. You've got a 5-4 decision to get rid of a something that has been settled as a constit

sidis
sidis

in one of the many instances in which i debunked your oversimplified, unsupported bullshit and you simply never responded, i addressed your absolutist contention that religious are more charitable tha

Posted Images

Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105,154

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

 

 

 

The....RELATIVELY....sane wing of the court trying to walk back the utter fucking idiocy and lunacy that is Bruen, a decision authored by the worst justice in SCOTUS history, Clarence Thomas, brought to you by Harlan Crow.  You fucking dumbfucks.  You can try, but you can't shove Bruen back in a box or pretend it doesn't exist.  And Clarence's dissent today fucking says as much: "No, I meant every lunatic word of Bruen, and y'all should apply it like I meant it."

Alito and Thomas are hanging so many fucking albatrosses around this court's neck, it's hard to keep count.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
immamac

immamac 42,864

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Js1 said:

 

No Way Wtf GIF by Harlem

idk man seems like a stretch to me at a glance, but I didn't dig too deep. Dude was MS-13 got denied, then they tried again after he "disavowed MS-13" (as if that's a real thing without being killed). Then she petitioned on his behalf trying to say because they were married he had some type of rights that extend from the citizenship of his spouse? 

I wonder what kind of case this would even benefit as this one is so absurd and ridiculous that the non-weird version of this is too hard for me to imagine. People get denied visas all the time to the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105,154

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

Supreme Court: We didn't mean that shit.

Thomas in dissent: I meant that shit.

Yep.  Imagine the dumbest, stupidest, least legally and intellectually position in the world.  The rest of the Supremes look at that and say "yeah, no reasonable person would think that."  Thomas: "Fuck yeah, that's exactly what I meant."

He's beyond terrible.  He's beyond corrupt.  He's a fucking idiot.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17,625

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

The....RELATIVELY....sane wing of the court trying to walk back the utter fucking idiocy and lunacy that is Bruen, a decision authored by the worst justice in SCOTUS history, Clarence Thomas, brought to you by Harlan Crow.  You fucking dumbfucks.  You can try, but you can't shove Bruen back in a box or pretend it doesn't exist.  And Clarence's dissent today fucking says as much: "No, I meant every lunatic word of Bruen, and y'all should apply it like I meant it."

Alito and Thomas are hanging so many fucking albatrosses around this court's neck, it's hard to keep count.

Yup. Thomas' dissent is exactly right based upon Bruen. You also now have to look at the multiple concurring opinions and the dissent and try and figure out where this actually leaves the law. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HenryJames

HenryJames 66,119

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Yup. Thomas' dissent is exactly right based upon Bruen. You also now have to look at the multiple concurring opinions and the dissent and try and figure out where this actually leaves the law. 

 

image.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105,154

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

and figure out where this actually leaves the law. 

It remains where it was all along: Calvinball.  The "look back to see what, umm, the, uhh, 'regulatory feel' was at the time" test is bullshit SCOTUS-speak for "I'll decide each case how I want, then look back at a bit of history to proof-text my way into the result I already chose."  It's not a legal standard at all.  It's an excuse and pretext for every SCOTUS justice going forward to just say "this is how I want it to be."

Calvinball.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
'stache

'stache 21,819

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Wait . . . in the text above, does the reference to "bearable" imply the ability to physically carry a particular weapon?  

Sure, why not. If you can strap a nuclear warhead to your back, it's your fucking right, go for it.

image.png.fee4ee1a50789a55a848d5997e9177f4.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tokamak

tokamak 6,431

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Yep.  Imagine the dumbest, stupidest, least legally and intellectually position in the world.  The rest of the Supremes look at that and say "yeah, no reasonable person would think that."  Thomas: "Fuck yeah, that's exactly what I meant."

He's beyond terrible.  He's beyond corrupt.  He's a fucking idiot.

On the bright side, he's 75 and can't live forever.

On the down side, he'll probably retire in 2028 and Trump will replace him with, like, Kyle Rittenhouse.

  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chainsaw

chainsaw 9,870

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, immamac said:

he "disavowed MS-13"

To be fair I've heard their power has dropped dramatically since the crackdowns of president Bukele. Before the crackdowns if you didn't play nice with the gangs the gangs wouldn't play nice with you, and "playing nice" usually meant doing something that could be seen as having an affiliation.

Now they're sort of indiscriminately arresting "military age men" even on mere suspicion of being affiliated. Good reason to publicly "disavow" the gangs, even if it has nothing to do with immigrating to the US.

 

Alito switched from capture the flag to hide and seek.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chainsaw

chainsaw 9,870

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, HenryJames said:

Texas abortion law vibes.

 

1d55e347-7aa4-46a8-a67c-88a5dccc4544.png

What's "relevantly similar" is in the eye of the beholder. And by "the beholder," I mean the Christofascist puppet installed by a dark money group.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105,154

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, tx ind said:

Alito hiding out? 

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/21/politics/samuel-alito-not-present-supreme-court/index.html

It takes time to plot to overthrow the US Government and install a fascist theocracy.  It's hard do that and Supreme Courty stuff at the same time, especially for a fella of Alito's age, so cut him some slack.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
956 Worldwide

956 Worldwide 34,715

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

These were the fucking facts of the case.

32e8fcf3-1eaa-42a7-bb83-4e55dfc3d0b8.png

There is a compelling federalist case that state and local officials should be allowed to be corrupt. I don’t see how the republic functions without those protections.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...