Jump to content

The Supremes

tx 3 putt

By tx 3 putt
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
aggie08

aggie08 20618

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
18 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Same.  Until then, I'll just point out to lefty posters that I hate them as much or more than they hate me.

I don't hate you, man. Life's too short for that shit. All I can muster up is pity. What kind of person gets joy out of what you do here? Talk about a pathetic, empty existence.

  • Hook 'Em 12
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 12.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Brisketexan
Brisketexan

Some people and posts above see this for the incredibly dangerous thing it is.  See the whole forest, not just the tree.  Roe is built on the bedrock of the 14th amendment and the inherent right to pr

Ghost of LL
Ghost of LL

The whole episode is pretty bad for the Court.  The leak is embarrassing.  But the decision is catastrophic. You've got a 5-4 decision to get rid of a something that has been settled as a constit

sidis
sidis

in one of the many instances in which i debunked your oversimplified, unsupported bullshit and you simply never responded, i addressed your absolutist contention that religious are more charitable tha

Posted Images

Francisco 2.0

Francisco 2.0 32237

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, Gourmand said:

fuck you and fuck your fucking feelings.

I wish nothing but the WORST for all current Republicans. You have destroyed this country with your voting habits and your support of lunatic christofascists and your propensity to be duped into believing the dumbest fucking shit ever in the name of an unrelenting thirst for right-wing power.

You are all dead to me. 

 

Stern, but fair.

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12539

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, fattyflattie said:

The biggest cunt on the board calling someone else a cunt is highly ironic. 

I don’t actually think it is but I’m not an English major. I also don’t care that your feelings got hurt about people being mean to your ilk. Cry more

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45242

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:

The biggest cunt on the board calling someone else a cunt is highly ironic. 

You think Hobbes is the biggest cunt?  What has he done?  Honest question. If it’s on the football boards, I’m probably unaware. That place is just nuts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleChest

SizzleChest 8264

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Same.  Until then, I'll just point out to lefty posters that I hate them as much or more than they hate me.

I think you have made that pretty clear without pointing it out further, which is probably the main reason why you should not post here any more.  If all you have is hate, and all they have is hate, what's keeping you here?  

You sound entirely like a petty, troubled person that just needs to hang out with your own.  Even for those that present a more moderate set of perspectives, don't neg, use humor and sarcasm intelligently, and otherwise contribute to the conversations without triggering anyone, any discussion with you is pretty damn worthless in that respect.  

Banning you is dumb.  You'll just martyr yourself.  It's all in your head anyway.  Seek help, but first just move along.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12539

Posted
Posted
Just now, fattyflattie said:

So, considering the events of the last 24 hours, would you consider this statement ironic? 

Nope but again someone who knows more about it can probably clarify. I don’t really give a shit. 
You and those you associate with are cunts. You can say “no you are” all you want. Im not offended by someone calling me a cunt because I don’t get mad about being called names by random people on the internet. If you’d like a safe space im sure we can find one for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12539

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Biff Tannen said:

You think Hobbes is the biggest cunt?  What has he done?  Honest question. If it’s on the football boards, I’m probably unaware. That place is just nuts. 

I got into with @sidis on the college World Series thread and he could probably use an apology from me. Texas Baseball is serious business. But he’s an Everton fan anyway.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Gatorubet

Gatorubet 29829

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
22 minutes ago, Goredho said:

This is a great post, and where I am at with conservatives.  Prior to about 2015 when I was 45, I had many conservative friends and family members.  But as we ran into issues with the conservative hand on the Texas education system (see the Texpatriate thread), I started struggling with them.  In our personal interactions, they were and still are kind and generous.  But I started struggling with their support of candidates and policies that directly harm my family.

My kids who have special needs are not worth educating to the conservatives that say they love them.  My father in law came her illegally during the cuban revolution under the threat of death.  Today, he would be turned away to a very uncertain fate by the conservatives that say they love him.  I have a niece and nephew that are gay, both are married and have fled to live in Canada because they see what the future holds for them in America.  They have been driven out of this country by the conservative friends and family that say they love them.

These friends and family hug you and say they love you, but they would deny your kids an education, their right to love who they choose, their right to their life's happiness and even their right to a life at all through their support of this radical conservative movement that has run amok in this country.

The saddest part is that they are clueless about it.  They wonder why you no longer call, say you love them or hug them back.  No matter how you try to explain, they can't see how their votes and support for this new brand of dark conservatism directly relates to your and/or your loved one's pain.  Because all they want to see is how they've treated you personally, and they ignore the damage from the policies their votes have enabled.

It's pretty fucking sad.

This is so perfect a post.   I have conservative friends who live in their rich white straight world and can’t see why me, a father of a gay child, is not happy with them.     I have been launching them, telling them they are the nice Germans who looked the other way, and that being friends with horrible people (explaining that only horrible people support horrible candidates and policies) is no longer possible.  

The response is that they do not see where disagreeing on politics means we can’t be friends…(or that I am a libtard who hates America).  I reply that hate, lies and indifference to the suffering of their fellow man is not the same thing as “how much public funding of art is good” policy, and if they don’t get it, then I made the correct choice. 

  • Hook 'Em 12
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45231

Posted
Posted

Christians often dictate that people should love the sinner but hate the sin.

John taught "Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love."  1 John 4:8

 

and yet here we have one of the most pious Christofascists on surly admitting that he hates many posters on CR.

Now THAT'S a tell.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Chooky

Chooky 13279

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

People don't want to hear it, but it's time to consider just banning women entirely. I can't go to the grocery store without seeing tons of them pushing their existence bullshit in my face. It's pretty gay to have so many of them just waking around everywhere. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Poe It Up

Poe It Up 126

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Who is ‘we’’and ‘us’? 

If you are allied with the new GOP ideology built on lies, hate, voter suppression and science denying-then by all means, go away and post on Texags or Tiger Rant where like minded people are found.   Because even though most of MAGA world believes all the lies, that does not mean they aren’t lies, or that shutting down the spread of lies is some kind of political Jihad against conservatives.  

It’s simply anti-hate and lies. 

I think I’ve been remarkably deferential, almost to the point of embarrassment in my opinion. You’ll have to forgive my confusion, as I’m being told it’s Sack’s antics and not his political preference that requires banning. If it’s as simple as Republicans not being allowed to post here, then I’ll oblige. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45242

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Poe It Up said:

I think I’ve been remarkably deferential, almost to the point of embarrassment in my opinion. You’ll have to forgive my confusion, as I’m being told it’s Sack’s antics and not his political preference that requires banning. If it’s as simple as Republicans not being allowed to post here, then I’ll oblige. 

As has been stated a BILLION times, this board is probably majority (or at least close to 50/50) former republicans. Stop crying because we don’t tolerate disingenuous shitbags. If you have something to discuss in good faith, have at it. Unfortunately that precludes most of the R agenda these days. But by all means. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PenelopeWitherspoon

PenelopeWitherspoon 18566

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Poe It Up said:

I think I’ve been remarkably deferential, almost to the point of embarrassment in my opinion. You’ll have to forgive my confusion, as I’m being told it’s Sack’s antics and not his political preference that requires banning. If it’s as simple as Republicans not being allowed to post here, then I’ll oblige. 

Except for you are completely ok with women losing bodily autonomy.  You were clear about that when the draft leaked.  You are no better than Sack in that you want to impose your beliefs on others.  So fuck right off.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
washparkhorn

washparkhorn 9925

Posted
Posted

News alert: Southern Baptists were pro-abortion until Paul Weyrich created the Moral Majority narrative for the Christian Right. 
https://billmoyers.com/2014/07/17/when-southern-baptists-were-pro-choice/

“Conventional wisdom holds that the rise of the religious right as a political force to be reckoned with during the 1970s and 1980s was driven by conservative Christians’ intense opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade. But Dartmouth College’s Randall Balmer writes that “the abortion myth quickly collapses under historical scrutiny.”

He notes that “it wasn’t until 1979 — a full six years after Roe — that evangelical leaders, at the behest of conservative activist Paul Weyrich, seized on abortion not for moral reasons, but …. because the anti-abortion crusade was more palatable than the religious right’s real motive: protecting segregated schools.”

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Poe It Up

Poe It Up 126

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

As has been stated a BILLION times, this board is probably majority (or at least close to 50/50) former republicans. Stop crying because we don’t tolerate disingenuous shitbags. If you have something to discuss in good faith, have at it. Unfortunately that precludes most of the R agenda these days. But by all means. 

It’s more about clarification than crying. 

  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17291

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

As has been stated a BILLION times, this board is probably majority (or at least close to 50/50) former republicans. Stop crying because we don’t tolerate disingenuous shitbags. If you have something to discuss in good faith, have at it. Unfortunately that precludes most of the R agenda these days. But by all means. 

Anyone who still identifies as Republican is a disingenuous shitbag. Period. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bolverk

bolverk 29121

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Poe It Up said:

I think I’ve been remarkably deferential, almost to the point of embarrassment in my opinion. You’ll have to forgive my confusion, as I’m being told it’s Sack’s antics and not his political preference that requires banning. If it’s as simple as Republicans not being allowed to post here, then I’ll oblige. 

Just to be clear, I personally haven't made any attacks on you, but I do question why you support a party with representatives who state wildly insane things like this:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleChest

SizzleChest 8264

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Just to be clear, I personally haven't made any attacks on you, but I do question why you support a party with representatives who state wildly insane things like this:

Pretty obvious she's never been raped.  2-1 on uncle molestation, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bolverk

bolverk 29121

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

News alert: Southern Baptists were pro-abortion until Paul Weyrich created the Moral Majority narrative for the Christian Right. 
https://billmoyers.com/2014/07/17/when-southern-baptists-were-pro-choice/

“Conventional wisdom holds that the rise of the religious right as a political force to be reckoned with during the 1970s and 1980s was driven by conservative Christians’ intense opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade. But Dartmouth College’s Randall Balmer writes that “the abortion myth quickly collapses under historical scrutiny.”

He notes that “it wasn’t until 1979 — a full six years after Roe — that evangelical leaders, at the behest of conservative activist Paul Weyrich, seized on abortion not for moral reasons, but …. because the anti-abortion crusade was more palatable than the religious right’s real motive: protecting segregated schools.”

I actually have a distinct recollection of this even at a young age though I don't exactly recall which year but I would guess it was around the 1980 timeframe.

My best friend at the time, Scott, lived across the street from me. He and I went to the same Southern Baptist church, and our moms had gone to some after hours church meeting/presentation and came back suddenly spouting their opposition to abortion. Prior to that, he and I had never heard any kind of discussion from our moms, but they were suddenly on the warpath.

I remember it because we were playing in the dirt, building forts for our army men under a couple of trees and had a discussion about it abortion for the first in our lives, because our moms were so suddenly riled up.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dr. Teeth

Dr. Teeth 5791

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Just to be clear, I personally haven't made any attacks on you, but I do question why you support a party with representatives who state wildly insane things like this:

They want women to be June Cleavers again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45231

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

News alert: Southern Baptists were pro-abortion until Paul Weyrich created the Moral Majority narrative for the Christian Right. 
https://billmoyers.com/2014/07/17/when-southern-baptists-were-pro-choice/

“Conventional wisdom holds that the rise of the religious right as a political force to be reckoned with during the 1970s and 1980s was driven by conservative Christians’ intense opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade. But Dartmouth College’s Randall Balmer writes that “the abortion myth quickly collapses under historical scrutiny.”

He notes that “it wasn’t until 1979 — a full six years after Roe — that evangelical leaders, at the behest of conservative activist Paul Weyrich, seized on abortion not for moral reasons, but …. because the anti-abortion crusade was more palatable than the religious right’s real motive: protecting segregated schools.”

I have been posting this for years.  Nobody ever seems to either believe it or remember it.

History . . . we can learn things.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tchookem

tchookem 3895

Posted
Posted
there is no fucking quiet part anymore
 
I'm sure the point he's trying to make is that SCOTUS has overturned bad decisions in past. Plessy was the bad decision overturned by Brown. He didn't word it well, because he's not good at this.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45242

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, tchookem said:
1 hour ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:
there is no fucking quiet part anymore
 

I'm sure the point he's trying to make is that SCOTUS has overturned bad decisions in past. Plessy was the bad decision overturned by Brown. He didn't word it well, because he's not good at this.

Except that was overturning a bad decision that ended up giving people more rights. This is the opposite. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Willfully Horn

Willfully Horn 7892

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

 

Obama campaigned on the ACA and won. Kavannaugh and Gotsuch straight up lied at their confirmation hearing. That you don’t acknowledge this is why you’re a fool. A putz that is also unaware, i assume, that the Right seeks absolute power vested in a monarch.

https://graymirror.substack.com/p/principles-of-the-deep-right

Of course, maybe you’re a fonferer-paskudnik.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Gatorubet

Gatorubet 29829

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
45 minutes ago, Poe It Up said:

I think I’ve been remarkably deferential, almost to the point of embarrassment in my opinion. You’ll have to forgive my confusion, as I’m being told it’s Sack’s antics and not his political preference that requires banning. If it’s as simple as Republicans not being allowed to post here, then I’ll oblige. 

You keep saying “Republican” as if it means something universal.  If you support the Big Lie that the election was stolen, then fuck off.   That is not “Republican”, that is a lie.  If you support the disenfranchising of voters, largely minority voters, making it difficult to vote or register to vote because of the lie that the Democrats are stealing the election, then fuck off, that is also democracy killing anti-American behavior based upon lies. 

What beliefs do you personally hold that you label honest, non-shit bag Republican.  You refuse to say.  So your post above is impossible to answer. 

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...