Jump to content

The Supremes

tx 3 putt

By tx 3 putt
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

horn4life

horn4life 3760

Posted
Posted

You know how when you thought a guy who wasn't asking any questions wasn't serious about his Job?

Well that mofo was serious as shit about getting benefits to live lifestyles of the rich and famous, and the law doesn't apply to him!  Welcome to The GOP Supreme Club!  Corruption is fine, pass the fine wine!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 12.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Brisketexan
Brisketexan

Some people and posts above see this for the incredibly dangerous thing it is.  See the whole forest, not just the tree.  Roe is built on the bedrock of the 14th amendment and the inherent right to pr

Ghost of LL
Ghost of LL

The whole episode is pretty bad for the Court.  The leak is embarrassing.  But the decision is catastrophic. You've got a 5-4 decision to get rid of a something that has been settled as a constit

sidis
sidis

in one of the many instances in which i debunked your oversimplified, unsupported bullshit and you simply never responded, i addressed your absolutist contention that religious are more charitable tha

Posted Images

  • Popular Post
Pods

Pods 7552

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

Every time anyone digs even slightly into Clarence Thomas, that surface scratch turns up blatant corruption.  

Would sure be nice if the Senate would hold hearings into this scandal, because digging in depth is almost certain to reveal shocking corruption for multiple Republican "justices". They won't consistently have covered their tracks well, because they don't expect to be caught. Even if caught, they know their fellow Republicans will never hold them accountable.

This is one of the biggest scandals in US history. We all know there is no amount of corruption that would get the GQP to go along with an impeachment and that they'll scream bloody murder about even investigating, but the public needs to see the Dems fighting for us, while fighting back is still allowed. 

Edited by Pods
  • Hook 'Em 17
  • Like 5
  • Rage+1 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chad Fuck

Chad Fuck 17679

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, 'stache said:

Literally the dumbest analogy I've ever heard, and Alito said it again just a few weeks ago.

It's not a terrible analogy.  It's just that it is patently false.  The umpire's goal is to be a neutral arbiter.  The strike zone is what it is, and the ball either passes through or does not.

But Alito and Thomas are clearly backing into their decisions.  It would be as if the umpire called the strike, before the pitcher threw the ball.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34238

Posted
Posted
It's not a terrible analogy.  It's just that it is patently false.  The umpire's goal is to be a neutral arbiter.  The strike zone is what it is, and the ball either passes through or does not.
But Alito and Thomas are clearly backing into their decisions.  It would be as if the umpire called the strike, before the pitcher threw the ball.  
 
And the catcher on pitchcom is koch or leo or crow. Between innings he suggests that a pitch up and in should be called a strike. So next one is.

But most umps disagreed around the league still. Until one day, there's a couple more umps bought by Leo, and maybe some others who were just sympathetic to billionaires. So over the pitchcom comes the up and in call. And those other umpires also suddenly call it a strike, citing back to that one time Umpire Thomas called it a strike to claim that this isn't something new.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Redneck Mutha

Redneck Mutha 7956

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Chad Fuck said:

It's not a terrible analogy.  It's just that it is patently false.  The umpire's goal is to be a neutral arbiter.  The strike zone is what it is, and the ball either passes through or does not.

But Alito and Thomas are clearly backing into their decisions.  It would be as if the umpire called the strike, before the pitcher threw the ball.  

 

Umpire GIFs | Tenor

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 76950

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Quote

It is far from clear, in other words, whether Edith Jones’s All American opinion would receive a passing grade if a law student submitted it as their final paper in a law school seminar on congressional appropriations, as it offers no meaningful evidence whatsoever for its central claim.

And yet Jones, Francisco, and several other Fifth Circuit judges would endanger the entire nation’s economy over a theory that has no basis in any legal text, and barely any support in all of the scholarship that has ever been produced by the American legal academy since the Constitution took effect in 1789.


 

the us fifth is broken and bat shit crazy, this well known 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85327

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

The Supremes standing up to Alabama, love it. They’re handing the house to the Dems 

You do not defy our ruling class of unelected partisans. That’s the message. You may not like the ruling, but they have spoken.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Js1

Js1 85327

Posted
Posted

Kind of related

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-judicial-panel-examine-judge-shopping-reforms-2023-10-17/

Quote

A federal judicial rules-making panel on Tuesday agreed to examine whether to curtail "judge shopping" by state attorneys general and activists who file lawsuits challenging government policies in courthouses where a single, sympathetic judge hears most cases.

Members of the U.S. Judicial Conference's Advisory Committee on Civil Rules at a meeting in Washington, D.C., grappled with whether it could or should craft nationwide rules to ensure such cases are randomly assigned a judge, as Senate Democrats have urged it to do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6938

Posted
Posted

Trammel Crow was a collector of world class Asian Art, most of which is housed in his collection in downtown Dallas. His son, Harlan seems to have a fascination with collecting Negroes. There’s, Clarence, Eric Johnson and now we learn 60’s hippie Cornell West has had a decades long relationship with him. Who knew?

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4267593-cornel-west-returns-harlan-crow-donation/

  • Rage+1 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6938

Posted
Posted

Good:

https://news.yahoo.com/finally-senate-democrats-coming-clarence-155843128.html

Senate Democrats have finally taken the first steps to address the ethics crisisrocking the Supreme Court.

The Senate Judiciary Committee announced Monday that it will seek to subpoena Republican billionaire megadonor Harlan Crow and ultraconservative activist Leonard Leo. Both men feature prominently in the ethics scandal for their relationships with Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. The committee will also seek to subpoena wealthy GOP donor Robin Arkley II.

“The Supreme Court is in an ethical crisis of its own making,” the committee said in a statement. “In order to adequately address this crisis, it is imperative that we understand the full extent of how people with interests before the Court are able to use undisclosed gifts to gain private access to the justices.”

All three men have so far either refused to cooperate with the committee’s investigation or offered to share an insufficient amount of information. The committee could authorize the subpoenas after a vote as soon as next week

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45683

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Satchel said:

Good:

https://news.yahoo.com/finally-senate-democrats-coming-clarence-155843128.html

Senate Democrats have finally taken the first steps to address the ethics crisisrocking the Supreme Court.

The Senate Judiciary Committee announced Monday that it will seek to subpoena Republican billionaire megadonor Harlan Crow and ultraconservative activist Leonard Leo. Both men feature prominently in the ethics scandal for their relationships with Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. The committee will also seek to subpoena wealthy GOP donor Robin Arkley II.

“The Supreme Court is in an ethical crisis of its own making,” the committee said in a statement. “In order to adequately address this crisis, it is imperative that we understand the full extent of how people with interests before the Court are able to use undisclosed gifts to gain private access to the justices.”

All three men have so far either refused to cooperate with the committee’s investigation or offered to share an insufficient amount of information. The committee could authorize the subpoenas after a vote as soon as next week

If I've learned anything over the past 8 years (god dammit), it's that congressional subpoenas aren't worth the paper they are printed on.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6938

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

If I've learned anything over the past 8 years (god dammit), it's that congressional subpoenas aren't worth the paper they are printed on.

More evidence that we undermine support and belief in our own government and its institutions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Captainant

Captainant 27664

Posted
Posted

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-ethics-code-conflicts-clarence-thomas-64d393ceb6f05402d762dca06f0f4187

lmfao their new ""code of ethics""" changes nothing and still leaves compliance up to each judge as an individual matter. And the court had the gall to write that they've been acting 100% ethically, and we just can't comprehend their methods. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45683

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Captainant said:

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-ethics-code-conflicts-clarence-thomas-64d393ceb6f05402d762dca06f0f4187

lmfao their new ""code of ethics""" changes nothing and still leaves compliance up to each judge as an individual matter. And the court had the gall to write that they've been acting 100% ethically, and we just can't comprehend their methods. 

Was waiting for this to be brought up.  The only actual solution here would be to impeach and remove Thomas and Alito AT MINIMUM.  Realistically every R judge and maybe one or two of the D ones.  Just clean it out.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 76950

Posted
  • Author
Posted
47 minutes ago, Captainant said:

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-ethics-code-conflicts-clarence-thomas-64d393ceb6f05402d762dca06f0f4187

lmfao their new ""code of ethics""" changes nothing and still leaves compliance up to each judge as an individual matter. And the court had the gall to write that they've been acting 100% ethically, and we just can't comprehend their methods. 

spongebob squarepants bullshit GIF

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...