Jump to content

The Supremes

tx 3 putt

By tx 3 putt
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Brisketexan
Brisketexan

Some people and posts above see this for the incredibly dangerous thing it is.  See the whole forest, not just the tree.  Roe is built on the bedrock of the 14th amendment and the inherent right to pr

Ghost of LL
Ghost of LL

The whole episode is pretty bad for the Court.  The leak is embarrassing.  But the decision is catastrophic. You've got a 5-4 decision to get rid of a something that has been settled as a constit

sidis
sidis

in one of the many instances in which i debunked your oversimplified, unsupported bullshit and you simply never responded, i addressed your absolutist contention that religious are more charitable tha

Posted Images

NameAlreadyInUse

NameAlreadyInUse 5169

Posted
Posted

My experience is that people that incessantly talk about things generally have an interest in participating in those things.  It's very weird to me how they fixate on this, and I think of all the people going on about the gays that liked to suck a cock behind the bushes and it makes me wonder how many of these people would 100% fuck a kid if they thought they could get away with it.  Or how many of them did because they realized they could get away with it.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 28562

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Neonmoon said:

Why do the Republicans keep talking about child pornography and prepubescent stuff?

 

 

for the same reason as sack and babyaga and those folks being so fixed on the PEDO(!!!!) in the rittenhouse case. It was in every other post of theirs. It had nothing to do with the facts at hand, but they made sure to point it out every time

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fudge Nuggets

Fudge Nuggets 19456

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Captainant said:

for the same reason as sack and babyaga and those folks being so fixed on the PEDO(!!!!) in the rittenhouse case. It was in every other post of theirs. It had nothing to do with the facts at hand, but they made sure to point it out every time

I never knew the sack was a pedo, but can’t say it’s a huge shock. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcat09

wildcat09 29591

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Captainant said:

for the same reason as sack and babyaga and those folks being so fixed on the PEDO(!!!!) in the rittenhouse case. It was in every other post of theirs. It had nothing to do with the facts at hand, but they made sure to point it out every time

Yeah, it's primarily a blood libel. Of course for some of them, it's also projection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TurkeyChew

TurkeyChew 383

Posted
Posted

She’s basically guaranteed to get in by virtue of the D majority right? This isn’t something that Manchin or Kyrsten would block, I assume. So the R’s hazing her are doing it because it’s expected of them from their constituents, not because it will have a material effect on outcomes. Do I have that right?

Same reason Kavanaugh was a shoe in last time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34753

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, TurkeyChew said:

She’s basically guaranteed to get in by virtue of the D majority right? This isn’t something that Manchin or Kyrsten would block, I assume. So the R’s hazing her are doing it because it’s expected of them from their constituents, not because it will have a material effect on outcomes. Do I have that right?

Same reason Kavanaugh was a shoe in last time?

the Rs hazing her are doing so because they can get their faces on TV and fundraise off this.  i can guarantee you that hawley and ted are going to have already sent out fundraising emails with "the democrats are pushing this pedo-lover through the senate!" as the hook.  and their marks will have seen kid hitler and cancruz on tv, or a video on twitter, or facebook, and they'll be all in on it.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TurkeyChew

TurkeyChew 383

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, elfenix said:

the Rs hazing her are doing so because they can get their faces on TV and fundraise off this.  i can guarantee you that hawley and ted are going to have already sent out fundraising emails with "the democrats are pushing this pedo-lover through the senate!" as the hook.  and their marks will have seen kid hitler and cancruz on tv, or a video on twitter, or facebook, and they'll be all in on it.

So essentially it's practical politics to harass this woman because they enhance their brand (to their constituents) and if they aren't doing this, it's political malpractice to their constituents. But they are all resigned to the fact that this woman will be the next Supreme and all of this is a formality, is what I'm hearing. Got it and thanks that helps. Like others have said, not sure this is even worth paying attention to or watching knowing all that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
C-Man

C-Man 27784

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
1 hour ago, Jive Turkey said:

"Senator Cruz, based on what I have seen, you're not a man at all."  That's what she should have said.

 

If it was such an important question to ask why did he decide to wait until his time was up to get to it. Instead, we talked about children's books and if he as a hispanic man could "convert" to be Asian if he wanted to.

 

17 minutes ago, TurkeyChew said:

So essentially it's practical politics to harass this woman because they enhance their brand (to their constituents) and if they aren't doing this, it's political malpractice to their constituents. But they are all resigned to the fact that this woman will be the next Supreme and all of this is a formality, is what I'm hearing. Got it and thanks that helps. Like others have said, not sure this is even worth paying attention to or watching knowing all that.

You are a such duplicitous shit-bird. And what makes it worse is you try ever-so-hard to come off as not being on either side of the aisle when it's clear you're either a foreign provocateur troll or firmly in the MAGA camp. You're a shit-stirrer.

  • Hook 'Em 10
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huckleberry

Huckleberry 34677

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, C-Man said:

If it was such an important question to ask why did he decide to wait until his time was up to get to it. Instead, we talked about children's books and if he as a hispanic man could "convert" to be Asian if he wanted to.

 

You are a such duplicitous shit-bird. And what makes it worse is you try ever-so-hard to come off as not being on either side of the aisle when it's clear you're either a foreign provocateur troll or firmly in the MAGA camp. You're a shit-stirrer.

No, you should take him at his word. He's genuinely as dumb as he acts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 27784

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Pancho said:

Radical republican senators with their racist tropes are just trash and anti American 

And it's a fucking shame the political grandstanding she's had to endure from CHUDS like Hawley and Cruz to get her SCOTUS seat.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Longhorn_Fan68

Longhorn_Fan68 34106

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, C-Man said:

If it was such an important question to ask why did he decide to wait until his time was up to get to it. Instead, we talked about children's books and if he as a hispanic man could "convert" to be Asian if he wanted to.

 

You are a such duplicitous shit-bird. And what makes it worse is you try ever-so-hard to come off as not being on either side of the aisle when it's clear you're either a foreign provocateur troll or firmly in the MAGA camp. You're a shit-stirrer.

a shit-stirrer that the mods have for some reason given immunity to 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TurkeyChew

TurkeyChew 383

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

a shit-stirrer that the mods have for some reason given immunity to 

There was nothing "stirrer" about my posts, the guy just will never be able to get over that he doesn't like me and doesn't know how to use the ignore button, much like yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bama Chick

Bama Chick 28596

Posted
Posted
Why do the Republicans keep talking about child pornography and prepubescent stuff?
 
 

They’re dog whistling the QAnon crazies.

They’re doing it with the Florida “Don’t Say Gay” bill by using language like grooming and with the various trans bathroom bills.

It’s their way of keeping that bunch engaged with subtle triggers so they don’t have to engage with the crazy explicitly.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 32083

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, TurkeyChew said:

and if they aren't doing this, it's political malpractice to their constituents

No, it really isn't.  Their constituents don't really care.  They're creating issues and creating controversy so they can tell their constituents that libruls are appointing pedo-lovers to the Supreme Court and they tried to expose it and stop it.

It's not "practical politics."  It's bad-faith demagoguery of the worst kind.  The absolute worst.

That it jibes with Qanon narratives makes it that much more irresistible.

It makes Joe McCarthy look like Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 15
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 27784

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

No, it really isn't.  Their constituents don't really care.  They're creating issues and creating controversy so they can tell their constituents that libruls are appointing pedo-lovers to the Supreme Court and they tried to expose it and stop it.

It's not "practical politics."  It's bad-faith demagoguery of the worst kind.  The absolute worst.

That it jibes with Qanon narratives makes it that much more irresistible.

It makes Joe McCarthy look like Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.

It took me a long, long, long time to come to this realization but the Republican party for the most part is populated by absolute monsters. You'd better be white, rich and preferably male to make it in their perceived world.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 47221

Posted
Posted

The pseudo-rage over her child porn sentencing is just one more thing that has a perfectly valid explanation, but they intentionally twist the narrative to white knight for their base.  According to what I've read, it is widely accepted in the legal community that Federal sentencing guidelines for possession (not creation) of child porn are far too harsh.  Even prosecutors routinely suggest well-less-than-minimum sentences.

Ted knows this.  Ted doesn't care.  Ted is a monster.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...